TABLE 3.
Species | Gene | Purpose of manipulation | Type of KI | Approach | SCNT or MI | KI Animals produced | Mosaicism (%) | References |
Agriculture: improvements in | ||||||||
Sheep | SOCS2 | Reproductive traits | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 BE | MI | 3/4 (25%) | 3/3 (100%) | Zhou et al. (2019) |
BMPR1B | Reproductive traits | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 5/21 (23.8%) | Not stated | Zhou et al. (2018) | |
Goat | Tβ4 | CCR5-targeted KI, cashmere yield | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 1 | N/A | Li X. et al. (2019) |
FGF5 | Cashmere yield | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 BE | MI | 5/5 (100%) | 5/5 (100% | Li G. et al. (2019) | |
GDF9 | Reproductive traits | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 4/17 (23.5%) | 2/4 (50.0%) | Niu et al. (2018) | |
FAT-1 | Disease resistance | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 1 from 8 pregnancies | N/A | Zhang J. et al. (2018) | |
Cattle | Pc | Generation of a polled genotype | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas12a | SCNT | 1, died on D1 after birth | N/A | Schuster et al. (2020) |
NRAMP1 | Tuberculosis resistance | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9n | SCNT | 9 | N/A | Gao et al. (2017) | |
IARS | Correction of IARS syndrome | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 5 viable fetuses | N/A | Ikeda et al. (2017) | |
Pig | PBD-2 | Disease-resistant pigs | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 5 pigs | N/A | Huang et al. (2020) |
MSTN | Meat production | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 2 pigs | N/A | Zou Y.-L. et al. (2019) | |
UCP1 | Reproduction traits | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 12 piglets | N/A | Zheng et al. (2017) | |
MSTN | Meat production | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 1 stillborn piglet | N/A | Wang K. et al. (2016) | |
MSTN | MSTN-KO without selectable marker | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 2 piglets | No | Bi et al. (2016) | |
RSAD2 | Generation of pigs with viral resistance | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 1 pig | No | Xie et al. (2020) | |
Biomedical applications: | ||||||||
Sheep | ALPL | Model of hypophosphatasia | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 6/9 (66.6%) | No | Williams et al. (2018) |
PPT1 | Infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 6/24 (25.0%) | Not stated | Eaton et al. (2019) | |
tGFP | Rosa26-targeted KI | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 1/8 (12.5%) | Not stated | Wu et al. (2016) | |
OTOF | Hearing loss phenotype | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 8/73 (11.0%) | 2/8 (25.0%) | Menchaca et al. (2020b) | |
Cattle | CMAH | Xenotransplantation | Point mutation | Crispr/Cas12a | SCNT | 2 | N/A | Perota et al. (2019) |
Pig | hF9 | Gene therapy for hemophilia B pigs | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 5 pigs | N/A | Chen et al. (2020) |
BgEgXyAp | Salivary gland as bioreactor | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 4 piglets (1/4 alive) | N/A | Li G. et al. (2020) | |
hIAPP | Type 2 diabetic miniature pig model | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 24 | N/A | Zou X. et al. (2019) | |
SNCA | Parkinson’s disease model | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 8 piglets | N/A | Zhu et al. (2018) | |
HTT | Huntingtin KI model | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 6 piglets | N/A | Yan et al. (2018) | |
GGTA1 | Xenotransplantation | Gene insertion | FokI-dCas9 | SCNT | 2 piglets | N/A | Nottle et al. (2017) | |
tdTomato | porcine Oct4 reporter system | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 2 piglets | N/A | Lai et al. (2016) | |
hALB | Tg animals as bioreactors | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | MI | 16/16 (100%) | 1/16 (6.3%) | Peng et al. (2015) | |
GFP | H11-targeted KI | Gene insertion | Crispr/Cas9 | SCNT | 1 piglet | N/A | Ruan et al. (2015) |
SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; MI, zygote microinjection; BE, base editing; N/A, not applicable.