Table 1.
Cell-free mRNA in DLBCL
| References | Method | Sample | mRNA | Level | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | |||||
| Garcia et al. [41] | RT-qPCR plasma |
42 DLBCL 50 controls |
CCND2, BCL2, MYC, LMO2 BCL6, FN1 |
Up NS |
Higher level in DLBCL No difference |
| Zhao et al.[44] | RT-qPCR peripheral blood |
63 DLBCL 32 controls |
CREBBP | Up | Higher level in DLBCL |
| Response to therapy | |||||
| Garcia et al. [41] | RT-qPCR plasma |
42 DLBCL 50 controls |
MYC CCND2, BCL2, LMO2, BCL6,FN1 |
Up NS |
Higher level of MYC was associated with PR in patients with low-risk IPI No significant association with response to R-CHOP |
| Attia et al. [45] | RT-qPCR plasma |
30 NHL (15 DLBCL) 20 controls |
SOCS-3 | Up | Higher level was associated with poor response to treatment (NR/PR versus CR) in NHL |
| Prognosis | |||||
| Garcia et al. [41] | RT-qPCR plasma |
42 DLBCL 50 controls |
MYC, CCND2 CCND2, BCL2, MYC |
Up Up |
Higher level of MYC or CCND2 was associated with worse OS, with the latter only in low-risk IPI group Higher level of CCND2, BCL2 or MYC in patients with CR was associated with worse PFS |
| Ujj et al. [47] | RT-qPCR PAXgene blood RNA tube |
25 DLBCL 35 controls |
WT1 | Up | Higher level in pre-, intra- or posttreatment samples was associated with worse DFS and OS |
CR complete response, DFS disease-free survival, IPI international prognostic index, mRNA messenger RNA, NHL non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, NR no response, NS not significant, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, PR partial response, RT-qPCR reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction