Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 15;16:86. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01658-4

Table 2.

HRQoL assessments (EQ-5D, HADS, WPAI, TSQM) at baseline and end-of-study, both C1-INH(SC) doses combined (N = 126)

HRQoL assessment Scoring and interpretation Baseline End of study (week 53 or extension week 88) Intra-subject change from baselinea
n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD) n Mean (SD)
EQ-5D
 Health state value

Health state value: scored from 0 (dead) to 1 (full health); population norm in the US = 0.825 [34]

VAS: scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best imaginable health state); population norm in the US = 80.0 [34]

114 0.90 (0.168) 100 0.95 (0.098) 92 0.05 (0.153)
 VAS 114 81.32 (17.600) 100 87.72 (13.036) 92 5.83 (14.601)
HADS
 Depression

Both domains:

0–7 (normal)

8–10 (suggestive of the mood disorder)

> 11 (probable presence of the mood disorder)

Maximum (worst) score possible per domain = 21

114 2.88 (2.930) 100 1.91 (2.629) 92 − 0.80 (2.641)
 Anxiety 114 5.48 (3.863) 100 4.11 (3.533) 92 − 1.23 (3.089)
WPAI
 Absenteeism (% work time missed)b

All domains

Higher % = greater impairment (maximum score = 100%)

69 6.15 (17.056) 68 2.67 (11.670) 52 − 4.89 (23.296)
 Presenteeism (% impairment while working)b 68 19.71 (26.653) 68 8.24 (18.604) 51 − 14.31 (31.765)
 Work productivity loss (% overall work impairment)b 68 22.11 (29.018) 68 9.45 (20.766) 51 − 15.97 (34.946)
 Activity impairment (% activity (non-work) impairment 114 27.54 (29.436) 100 14.40 (24.917) 92 − 14.35 (32.013)
TSQM
 Effectiveness

Each domain

Scoring range is 0–100; higher scores indicate better outcomes

104 73.88 (25.000) 100 83.67 (27.237) 82 15.04 (29.854)
 Convenience 104 70.94 (16.965) 100 80.56 (17.470) 82 8.81 (17.632)
 Overall satisfaction 104 78.79 (22.414) 100 92.42 (13.253) 82 14.57 (23.016)

C1-INH(SC) subcutaneous C1-inhibitor, EQ-5D European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HRQoL health-related quality of life, TSQM Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, WPAI Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, SD standard deviation, VAS visual analog scale

aThe Change from Baseline analysis included only patients with both Baseline and End of Study scores, thus the number of patients in this column may be smaller than that shown in the End of Study column as a consequence of missing baseline data

bAssessment completed only by employed patients