Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;137(6):751–762. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007732

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of AML patients in dose escalation, RP2D, and PIF/ER subgroup analyses

Characteristic Dose escalation, N = 42 RP2D population, N = 50 RP2D PIF/ER, N = 30*
Age, median (range), y 64 (29, 84) 64 (27, 82) 59 (27, 74)
Sex, female, n (%) 18 (42.9) 19 (38.0) 10 (33.3)
AML status at entry, n (%)
 Primary refractory, ≥2 induction attempts 15 (35.7) 24 (48.0) 24 (80.0)
 Early relapse, CR duration ≤6 mo 8 (19.0) 6 (12.0) 6 (20.0)
AML risk stratification, ELN 2017, n (%)
 Adverse 13 (31.0) 26 (52.0) 18 (60.0)
 Intermediate 8 (19.0) 12 (24.0) 7 (23.3)
 Favorable 10 (23.8) 6 (12.0) 5 (16.7)
Secondary AML, n (%) 10/42 (23.8) 16/50 (32.0) 12/30 (40)
No. of prior lines of therapy, median (range) 2 (0, 9) 3 (1, 9) 4 (1, 9)
Failed induction therapy, n (%)
 Cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy N/A N/A 21 (70)
 Alternative induction therapy N/A N/A 3 (10)
ER, <6 mo
 n (%) 4 (9.5) 6 (12) 6 (20)
 Median duration of CR (range), mo N/A 1.6 (0.8-5.1) 1.6 (0.8-5.1)
BM blasts at time of study enrollment, median (range), % 40 (2-98) 46 (5-94) 41 (5-94)
Baseline WBC, median (range), ×109/L 2 (0.4-29.7) 1.95 (0.3-67) 2.35 (0.4-16.2)

N/A, not applicable; WBC, white blood cell.

*

A subset of the RP2D patient population.