Table 7. Potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon rabies activities.
Benefits | Limitations |
---|---|
Greater appreciation for diseases of nature and viral zoonoses specifically, such as rabies |
Lessons lost, due to pandemic fatigue |
Enhanced laboratory-based surveillance for lyssaviruses | Pathogen discovery focused primarily upon coronaviruses alone |
Additional scrutiny to better understand how bat populations deal with lyssavirus burden |
Unnecessary backlash against bat populations in general |
Broader consideration of dogs now as pets, rather than livestock for consumption, closure of wildlife markets, and halting use of bats as bushmeat |
Unpopular consumptive activities driven ever more underground |
Shelter-in-place, limiting human exposure to rabid animals | Mass unemployment drives even greater community shifts and increases individual movements for resources |
More animals vaccinated in aftermath of best practices, including use of drive-up clinics |
Veterinary services not viewed as an essential activity compared to public health |
New vaccine approaches provide insights for novel human prophylaxis |
Unfulfilled promises and adverse events sour demand for novel products |
Anti-viral strategies reap extension against other RNA viruses, such as in the Mononegavirales |
No major cross-reactivity to rhabdoviruses |
Broader One Health adoptive strategies | Anti-public health sentiments due to presumption of civil liberties lost |
Global elimination of human rabies mediated via dogs (GEHRD) achieved before 2030 owing to greater preventive focus |
GEHRD setback for decades owing to economic global repercussions |