Table 2. Response patterns to the scenarios stratified by study variables.
| Variable | Always no (N = 178) n (unadjusted %) | Scenario dependent (N = 265) n (unadjusted %) | Always yes (N = 537) n (unadjusted %) | p (unadjusted analysis) | p (adjusted analysis*) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening test | 0.044 | 0.085 | |||
| FIT | 48 (14.7) | 94 (28.8) | 185 (56.6) | ||
| Sigmoidoscopy | 67 (20.6) | 72 (22.2) | 186 (57.2) | ||
| Colonoscopy | 63 (19.3) | 99 (30.4) | 164 (50.3) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.294 | 0.002 | |||
| 45–54 | 95 (16.6) | 166 (29.0) | 311 (54.4) | ||
| 55–64 | 61 (19.4) | 79 (25.2) | 174 (55.4) | ||
| >65 | 22 (23.9) | 20 (21.7) | 50 (54.4) | ||
| Sex | 0.085 | 0.063 | |||
| Female | 125 (19.4) | 183 (28.4) | 336 (52.2) | ||
| Male | 53 (15.9) | 82 (24.6) | 199 (59.6) | ||
| Ethnicity | 0.028 | 0.046 | |||
| White | 172 (18.4) | 246 (26.3) | 517 (55.3) | ||
| Non-white | 6 (16.2) | 17 (46.0) | 14 (37.8) | ||
| University level education | 0.454 | 0.92 | |||
| Yes | 89 (17.6) | 146 (28.8) | 272 (53.7) | ||
| No | 89 (18.9) | 119 (25.3) | 263 (55.8) | ||
| Family history | 0.001 | 0.013 | |||
| No | 163 (18.7) | 247 (28.3) | 462 (53.0) | ||
| Yes | 12 (14.0) | 11 (12.8) | 63 (73.3) | ||
| Prior history of screening | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | |||
| No | 159 (20.9) | 217 (28.5) | 385 (50.6) | ||
| Yes | 19 (8.8) | 48 (22.1) | 150 (69.1) | ||
| Numeracy | 0.034 | 0.051 | |||
| Low | 45 (21.7) | 42 (20.3) | 120 (58.0) | ||
| High | 133 (17.3) | 222 (28.9) | 413 (53.8) | ||
| Understanding of information | 0.723 | 0.58 | |||
| Incorrect | 90 (18.9) | 124 (26.1) | 262 (55.0) | ||
| Correct | 88 (17.5) | 141 (28.1) | 273 (54.4) | ||
| Prior perceptions of screening | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |||
| Yes for all | 44 (7.3) | 160 (26.7) | 396 (66.0) | ||
| No for all | 4 (20.0) | 4 (20.0) | 12 (60.0) | ||
| It depends | 130 (36.4) | 101 (28.3) | 126 (35.3) |
* Adjusted for all factors included in the table in addition to the order in which the scenarios were presented.