Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;10:e64684. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64684

Table 2. Description of the statistical analyses used in this study.

Fig. N Descriptive statistics Test used p Value Degrees of freedom and
F/t/z/R/ETC
Pos hoc analysis Adjusted
p value
 2E Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 67.20
F(DFn, DFd): 0.1441 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 2F Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 93.57
F(DFn, DFd): 1.868 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 2G Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 122.2
F(DFn, DFd): 1.096 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 2H Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 13.65
F(DFn, DFd): 0.8851 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 3A Four control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 15.13; df = 6 - -
 3B Four control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0005 t = 6.742; df = 6 - -
 3C Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0005 t = 10.47; df = 4 - -
 3D Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0002 t = 13.45; df = 4 - -
 3E Four control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 16.89; df = 6 - -
 3F Four control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 11.26; df = 6 - -
 4D Four control (E13.5)
four mutant (E13.5)
four control (E14.5)
four mutant (E14.5)
four control (P0)
four mutant (P0)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 498.6
F(DFn, DFd): 1.252 (5, 18)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 4E Four control (E13.5)
four mutant (E13.5)
four control (E14.5)
four mutant (E14.5)
four control (P0)
four mutant (P0)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 514.2
F(DFn, DFd): 7.873 (5, 18)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
 4F Four control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 22.92; df = 5 - -
 5B Three control-OE mice
7 Pax2-OE mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 67.67; df = 8 - -
 5C Five control-OE mice
5 Olig3-OE mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0001 t = 13.24; df = 8 - -
 6C Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.8969 t = 0.1380; df = 4 - -
 6D Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.6835 t = 0.4387; df = 4 - -
 6F Four control
4 Olig3 mutant
4 Olig2 mutant
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 1416
F(DFn, DFd): 0.8767 (2, 11)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
2-fs
1C
Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 299.8
F(DFn, DFd): 0.3133 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
2-fs
1D
Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 100.9
F(DFn, DFd): 0.2601 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
2-fs
1E
Three mice (E10.5)
three mice (E11.5)
three mice (E12.5)
three mice (E13.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 85.64
F(DFn, DFd): 0.08333 (3, 8)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
3-fs
1B
Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0093 t = 4.707; df = 4 - -
3-fs
1C
Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.2799 t = 1.249; df = 4 - -
3-fs
2A
Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 16.84; df = 4 - -
3-fs
2B
Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 17.51; df = 4 - -
3-fs
2C
Three control mice
three mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0801 t = 2.331; df = 4 - -
3-fs
3A
Four control (E11.5)
four mutant (E11.5)
four control (E12.5)
four mutant (E12.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 139.7
F(DFn, DFd): 2.328 (3, 12)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
3-fs
3B
Three control (E11.5)
four mutant (E11.5)
four control (E12.5)
four mutant (E12.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 118.9
F(DFn, DFd): 0.3083 (3, 11)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
3-fs
3C
Three control (E11.5)
four mutant (E11.5)
three control (E12.5)
four mutant (E12.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 232.2
F(DFn, DFd): 0.4627 (3, 10)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
3-fs
3D
Four control (E11.5)
four mutant (E11.5)
four control (E12.5)
four mutant (E12.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 156.3
F(DFn, DFd): 0.9549 (3, 12)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
3-fs
3E
Four control (E11.5)
four mutant (E11.5)
four control (E12.5)
four mutant (E12.5)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA 0.1739 F: 1.960
F(DFn, DFd): 0.4100 (3, 12)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
4-fs
2B
Four control (E13.5)
four mutant (E13.5)
four control (E14.5)
four mutant (E14.5)
four control (P0)
four mutant (P0)
Mean and SD Ordinary one-way ANOVA <0.0001 F: 850.2
F(DFn, DFd): 3.630 (5, 18)
Tukey’s multiple comparative test As indicated in the figure
5-fs
1B
Three control-OE mice
3 Pax2-OE mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 22.79; df = 4 - -
6-fs
1A
Three control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
<0.0001 t = 12.82; df = 5 - -
6-fs
1B
Three control mice
four mutant mice
Mean and SD Unpaired t-test
(two-tailed)
0.0002 t = 10.1; df = 5 - -

OE, overexpression; fs, figure supplement.