Table 3.
Comparison of model performance between the model with and without Sasang constitution.
AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-score | Balanced classification rate | Accuracy | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNN | Without SC | 0.73 | 0.31 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.61 | 0.75 |
With SC | 0.73 | 0.31 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 0.61 | 0.75 | |
| |||||||
Naive Bayes | Without SC | 0.79 | 0.40 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.78 |
With SC | 0.79 | 0.49 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.77 | |
| |||||||
Random forest | Without SC | 0.77 | 0.36 | 0.92 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
With SC | 0.78 | 0.37 | 0.92 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.77 | |
| |||||||
Decision tree | Without SC | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.93 | 0.45 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
With SC | 0.77 | 0.39 | 0.92 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.78 | |
| |||||||
MLP | Without SC | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.91 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.79 |
With SC | 0.8 | 0.47 | 0.91 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.79 | |
| |||||||
SVM | Without SC | 0.8 | 0.37 | 0.93 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.79 |
With SC | 0.8 | 0.38 | 0.93 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.79 | |
| |||||||
Logistic regression | Without SC | 0.8 | 0.39 | 0.93 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
With SC | 0.8 | 0.40 | 0.93 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
Sex, age, education, marriage status, smoking, body mass index, alcohol, activity, and stress were included. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; MLP, multilayer perceptron; SC, Sasang constitution; SVM, support vector machine.