Table 1.
Data-charting form.
| Section | Description | |
| Section 1: Overview | Summary of the basic information of the publication | |
| Publication type | Peer reviewed or grey literature | |
| Country | Name of the country or countries where the study took place or focused on | |
| Objective | Aim or objective of the publication | |
| Methodology | The specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information | |
| Study design and data management | Includes whether the researchers used quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches | |
| Setting of the study | The site in which the researcher conducted the study | |
| Summarized results | A short summary of the findings | |
| Section 2: Research questions | Includes the research questions and the date that the literature was published | |
| Suggested health care domain–specific FAIRificationa concepts and approaches | A description of FAIRification concepts and approaches in the health care domains | |
| FAIR implementation challenges, risks, and lessons learned | Encountered challenges or anticipated changes and lessons learned at different stages of FAIR data principle concept introduction, infrastructure implementation, and FAIRness evaluation | |
| Active networks involved in the implementation of the FAIR data principles in the health domain | Dedicated networks of scientific communities, research institutions, repositories or data archives, consortia, funding agencies, and citizens who are actively engaged in advocating FAIR principle data stewardship in the health care domains | |
| FAIRification reported outcomes | FAIR implementation outcomes in terms of data sharing, data reuse, and research publication after imposing FAIR data principles in health domain | |
aFAIR: findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable.