Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;9(3):e291–e300. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30493-9

Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness ratios from sensitivity analysis applying different discount rates to health effects and intervention costs

Baseline*, I$ per HLYG Health effects 3%, I$ per HLYG Health effects 6%, I$ per HLYG Intervention costs 0%, I$ per HLYG Intervention costs 6%, I$ per HLYG
Country income group
LLMICs (n=9) $94 (73–123) $179 (139–233) $280 (218–376) $108 (84–139) $83 (64–113)
UMHICs (n=5) $237 (191–303) $339 (270–432) $456 (365–596) $271 (215–337) $211 (167–273)
Suicides due to pesticides
2–9% (n=5) $699 (515–940) $1650 (1198–2219) $2934 (2074–3910) $799 (582–1079) $614 (441–823)
10–19% (n=3) $598 (449–796) $995 (761–1327) $1480 (1109–1981) $685 (506–892) $529 (398–696)
20–29% (n=4) $213 (168–281) $496 (392–652) $886 (696–1160) $244 (192–321) $189 (148–247)
>30% (n=2) $75 (58–99) $131 (102–174) $197 (154–259) $86 (66–113) $67 (52–88)

Data are n (95% uncertainty interval). Costs are in 2017 I$. I$=international dollars. HLYG=healthy life-years gained. LLMICs=low-income and lower-middle-income countries. UMHICs=upper-middle-income and high-income countries.

*

The baseline scenario applied a discount rate of 0% to health effects and 3% to intervention costs.