Table 2.
QTL for flowering time identified basing on SSR genetic map.
| QTLs | LG | Chr. | Positions (cM) | Intervals | LOD | Effecta | PVE (%) | Lines and environment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qFTYL16-2 | 2 | A06 | 58.81 | BrGMS453 – BrGMs753 | 2.94 | −2.00 | 3.74 | F2a population at Yangling in 2016 |
| qFTYL16-5 | 5 | C05 | 1.01 | BnGMS309 – BnGMS327 | 3.94 | −1.22 | 12.28 | |
| qFTYL16-16 | 16 | A07 | 15.41 | BnGMS370 | 3.68 | 1.71 | 7.28 | |
| qFTYL17-6 | 6 | A02 | 28.91 | BnGMS650 – BrGMS75 | 4.57 | −1.23 | 4.20 | F2:3 family at Yangling in 2017 |
| qFTSY17-7 | 7 | A10 | 19.01 | BnGMS625 – BrGMs579 | 2.94 | −0.98 | 12.17 | F2:3 family at Sanyuan in 2017 |
Chr., chromosome; LG, linkage group; LOD, logarithm of odds; PVE, phenotypic variance explained.
a
Positive and negative additive effects indicate that early flowering alleles are from DZ and GW, respectively.