Table 3.
LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool
Item description | Not presented (0) | Presented, partially (+ 1) | Presented, completely (+ 2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Authors and Institution information. Title of the video including name of the procedure and pathology treated | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
2 | Formal presentation of the case, including patient details and imaging, indication for surgery, comorbidities and previous surgery. Patient anonymity is maintained | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
3 | Position of patient, access ports, extraction site and surgical team | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
4 | The surgical procedure is presented in a standardised step by step fashion | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
5 | The intraoperative findings are clearly demonstrated, with constant reference to the anatomy | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
6 | Relevant outcomes of the procedure are presented, including operating time, postoperative morbidity and histology when appropriate | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
7 | Additional graphic aid is included such as diagrams, snapshots and photos to demonstrate anatomical landmarks, relevant or unexpected finding, or to present additional educational content | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
8 | Audio/written commentary in English language is provided | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
9 | The image quality is appropriate with constant clear view of the operating field. The video is fluent with appropriate speed | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |