Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;35(3):1067–1087. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07471-1

Table 2.

Clipping in the management of post-bariatric leak/fistula—characteristics of studies, included patients, and leak/fistula occurrence

Study Study type (n) Study information/additional treatmet (n) Clips alone (n) Bariatric surgery Age (range) M/F Time from surgery to leak/fistula Symptoms
Tabibian/2017 CR (1) Combined radiological-endoscopic approach 1 GB 65 0/1 NA Leak, intraabdominal abscess
Callabero/2016 CR (1) 1 SG 29 1/0 8 days Abdominal pain
Donatelli/2014 CR (1) Revision surgery as the first treatment, persistence of fistula 2 months later 1 GB 43 0/1 4 years Weight regain
Aly/2013 CR (2) Laparoscopic drainage, persistence of leak after 6 weeks (1) 2 SG

58

44

0/2

8 days,

11 months

Pain (2), fever (2), peritonitis (1)
Ritter/2013 CR (2)

Gastrojejunal anastomosis leak – percutaneous drainage

Gastrogastric fistula due to ulcer—surgical revision, persistence of leak 2 months later

2 GB

43

44

0/2

11 days

6 years

Pain (2), fever (1), collection (1), malaise (1)
Iacopini/2010 CR (1) Band removal (erosion) and external drainage (26 months after placement) 1 LAGB 45 0/1 2 weeks after band removal Pain, abdominal abscess
Merrifield/2006 CR (3) Persistence of fistulas (diagnosed 10 days after GB) after percutaneous drainage 1 GB NA NA 10 days Pain, sepsis, abdominal abscesses
Lee/2018 RS (21) Different etiology (3 cases after bariatric surgery) 3 NA 47, 49, 32 1/2 3–4 days NA
Benosman/2018 RS (26)

Comparison of endoscopic drainage (pigtail catheter with and without other endoscopic techniques, n = 7):

 + OTSC: 3, OTSC + SEMS: 2, + SEMS: 2

vs endoscopic closing techniques alone: (n = 19):

OTSC: 7, OTSC + SEMS: 5, SEMS: 7

Prior therapy: external drainage (10, 45.5%)

7 SG 45.6 (± 8.9) 7/19 NA

NA

Abdominal collection in 84.6% of patients

Kim/2017 RS

Complications of LAGB in 26 patients (7.4%) including intragastric migration, gastric leaks and fistulas. Endoscopic treatment in 6 patients including gastric leaks (n = 2) and fistulas (n = 1)

1 patient with leak treated with OTSC required percutaneous drainage of the fluid collection

1 LAGB 37 0/1 15 months Abdominal pain, band site infection
Niland/2017 RS (14)

Prior therapies: surgical revision (4), APC (11)

Concomitant therapy (1)

14 GB 46–67 3/11 0–38 years (mean: 9.4 years) Abdominal pan (7), nausea/vomiting (6), weight gain (2), heartburn (2)
Keren/2015 RS (26)

OTSC (19/26)

Other (7/26): stent (6), plastic biliary prosthesis (1), argon cautery (1), biologic glue (1)

19 SG 21–60 9/10 3–21 days Septic shock (1), tachycardia (3), fever (6), pain (5), collection (3), none/routine contrast study (4)
Law/2015 RS (47) Different etiology, bariatric surgery (10) (8 GB) 8 GB NA NA NA NA
Moon/2015 RS (15)

Conservative treatment: 8 (then stent in 6, surgery in 3)

Endoscopic treatment: 5 (fibrin glue in 3, hemoclips in 2)

Clips used also as second therapy in failures

2 SG 22–55 2/13 Early leak (1–6 weeks) Nausea, pain, fever
Mercky/2014 RS (30)

Different etiology, bariatric surgery: 19/30 (18 SG, 1 GB) Treatment:

OTSC (15/19); OTSC + SEMS: (3/19), OTSC + SEMS + clips + glue (1/19)

15

SG

GB

25–59 6/13

Early fistulas: 5 (7–20 days)

Chronic fistulas: 14 (50–1100 days)

NA
Surace/2011 RS (19) Bariatric surgery: 12 (11 SG, 1 GB) 12

SG

GB

NA NA NA NA
Bhardway/2010 RS (8) All fistulas treated with clips and APC 8 GB 22–66 0/8

 < 1 year: 2

5–15 years: 6

Weight regain (5), nausea (3), vomiting (2), pain (1)

n number, CR case report, RS retrospective, OTCS over-the-scope clip, SG sleeve gastrectomy, GB gastric banding, SEMS self-expandable metal stent, APC argon plasma coagulation, NA data not available