Table 3.
Variables | Factor 1 Attitude towards value of team debriefing with the OR Black Box® |
Factor 2 Satisfaction with the OR Black Box® performance report |
Factor 3* Attitude towards benefits of team debriefing with the OR Black Box® |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surgical procedure (upper-GI vs. adrenal, vs. colorectal) | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Role in the OR (ref = main surgeon) assisting surgeon anaesthesiology (including anaesthesia-nurse) OR nurses (SN & CN) |
B = − 0.652 B = − 0.329 |
95%CI − 1.13 to − 0.18 95%CI − 0.71 to 0.05 |
B = − 0.659 B = − 0.524 B = − 0.653 |
95%CI − 1.09 to − 0.23 95%CI − 1.0 to − 0.30 95%CI − 1.0 to − 0.30 |
B = − 0.842 – – |
95%CI − 0.43 to − 1.26 |
Age | B = 0.016 | 95%CI − 0.001 to 0.034 | – | – | – | |
Sex | – | – | – | – | – | |
Years working at the Amsterdam UMC | – | – | – | – | – | |
Number of previously attended Black Box debriefings (first time, 1–5 times, 6–10 times, > 10 times) |
B = 0.29 | 95%CI 0.09–0.49 | B = 0.414 | 95%CI 0.25–0.57 | B = 0.422 | 95%CI 0.59–0.26 |
Number of team members attending the debriefing | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Number of work days between procedure and debriefing | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Performance report feedback | ||||||
Total number of all (positive and negative) events in performance report | B = − 0.013 | 95%CI − 0.02 to − 0.002 | – | – | – | – |
aAll values in this factor pattern matrix were negative, therefore negative values in the model may be considered positive and positive values may be considered negative
B The beta coefficient, which is the degree of change in the factor for every 1 unit of change in the predictor variable