Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 10;30(2):629–641. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02662-8

Table 2.

CarerQol-7D and CarerQol-VAS scores by characteristics of caregiving situations

No. % CarerQol-7D index score, caregivers
Mean
(SD)
CarerQol-VAS (happiness) score, caregivers
Mean
(SD)
Nature of health problem (care recipient)

χ2 = 7.919

p = 0.019

χ2 = 1.152

p = 0.562

 Mostly physical problems 73 49.0 79.6 (14.4) 6.9 (2.1)
 Mostly mental problems 26 17.4 69.4 (20.7) 7 (2.5)
 Both 50 33.6 74 (14.8) 6.5 (2.4)
Health status of the care recipient

χ2 = 9.810

p = 0.020

χ2 = 2.626

p = 0.453

 Excellent/very good 8 5.4 75.0 (19.9) 7.5 (1.6)
 Good 25 16.8 74.8 (16.6) 6.6 (2.1)
 Fair 90 60.4 78.5 (15.4) 7 (2.2)
 Poor 26 17.4 68.5 (15.8) 6.1 (2.9)
Future improvements in care recipients’ health status

χ2 = 8.059

p = 0.045

χ2 = 5.398

p = 0.145

 No improvement is expected in the future (worsening may occur) 108 72.5 76.1 (15.9) 6.8 (2.3)
 It is expected to improve in the future 26 17.4 80 (13.8) 7.1 (2.2)
 I don’t know 14 9.4 65.8 (19.3) 5.9 (2.3)
 I don’t want to answer 1 0.7 93.7 10.0
Care provided for

χ2 = 4.670

p = 0.097

χ2 = 1.639

p = 0.441

  ≤ 6 months 12 8.1 66.8 (18.8) 6.5 (2.4)
 7–12 months 18 12.1 78.8 (14.3) 6.2 (2.6)
 More than 1 year 117 78.5 76.6 (15.9) 6.9 (2.2)
Relation of care recipient to the caregivera

χ2 = 9.716

p = 0.084

χ2 = 3.563

p = 0.614

 Partner 19 12.8 71.3 (14.6) 6.4 (2.2)
 Parent 53 35.6 76.3 (14) 6.5 (2.5)
 In-law 18 12.1 78.2 (11.8) 7.7 (1.4)
 Child 12 8.1 73.6 (14) 6.8 (1.7)
 Other family member 29 19.5 73.5 (21.4) 7.1 (2.1)
 Neighbour/friend 18 12.1 83.2 (18.2) 6.7 (2.8)
Living in the same household

χ2 = 5.948

p = 0.015

χ2 = 3.585

p = 0.058

 Yes 51 34.2 72.3 (15.5) 6.4 (2.2)
 No 98 65.8 77.9 (16.2) 7 (2.3)
Overall care experience

χ2 = 24.867

p = 0.000

χ2 = 17.213

p = 0.000

 Rather negative 43 28.9 65.6 (16.3) 5.4 (2.6)
 Neither negative, nor positive 69 46.3 80.2 (11.9) 7.2 (2)
 Rather positive 37 24.8 80.1 (17.8) 7.6 (1.7)

Differences of means were tested by Kruskal–Wallis test

aThe difference was statistically significant between ‘any family member’ (joint analysis of ‘partner’, ‘parent’, ‘parent in-law’, ‘child’ categories) and ‘friends or neighbours’ subgroups (p = 0.009)