Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;12:1046. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21368-0

Fig. 2. Model predictions compare favorably with Hi-C and ChIA-PET data in the TRIM5/6 locus.

Fig. 2

ad Model performance is evaluated by area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC) as parameters are varied individually (ac), and by grid search (d). Model predictions (upper-right) compared to (e) Hi-C data (bottom left) and f ChIA-PET data (bottom left). CTCF ChIP-seq signal is also shown as purple tracks in (e, f). The model predicts most of the direct CTCF ChIA-PET loop interactions, and Hi-C picks up additional contacts within the loops (or TADs) that are not the result of direct CTCF–CTCF interactions. g In the same locus, loops called by our model and ChIA-PET data are quite similar, as visualized using the WashU epigenome browser.