Table 4.
Future directions and unmet needs
Question | Significance | Future Directions |
---|---|---|
Does using a HF risk score to identify individuals for preventive interventions reduce incident HF? | Important to identify patients that will gain the greatest benefit from early use of emerging preventive therapies | Trials comparing a clinical risk score-based strategy of management including subsequent use of biomarkers, imaging, and interventions focused on HF prevention compared with usual care |
Does intensive lifestyle intervention in high-risk adults reduce incident HF? | Programs like the diabetes prevention program have shown significant benefits for risk factor management, and a similar framework needs to be explored with HF prevention | Creation and implementation of an intensive lifestyle program focused on adults at high-risk for HF with longitudinal follow-up to determine efficacy |
When should biomarker or imaging-based screening be started in individuals with highly prevalent risk alleles to identify subclinical cardiac dysfunction? | The V122I TTR variant and the MYBPC3 deletion variant are present in nearly 4% of the African American and South Asian populations, respectively | Longitudinal cohort studies of young to middle-aged African American and South Asian adults with genetic data and contemporary cardiac imaging |
In adults with TTR risk alleles, does initiation of TTR-specific therapies or aggressive risk factor modification during the subclinical phase prevent onset of HF? | Interaction of TTR risk alleles with clinical risk factors is not known; rationale for early use of TTR-specific therapies is based on the underlying pathophysiology and may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality | Large longitudinal cohorts studies to evaluate the interaction between TTR risk alleles and clinical risk factors; clinical trials of TTR-specific therapies in patients with TTR risk alleles and Stage B HF |
How should HF risk be assessed in individuals with different risk enhancing features? | Clinical risk scores validated in the general population have not been specifically evaluated in these populations and disease-specific characteristics may need to be added to the score to improve its performance | Use of multicenter registries, specialized cohort studies, and electronic health record data to identify large enough cohorts for these more rare risk enhancing diseases |