Table 3.
Admission PHE volume | |||
Beta | 95% Confidence Interval | P value | |
Unadjusted | 0.03 | −0.04–0.11 | 0.36 |
Model 2 | 0.03 | −0.05–0.11 | 0.41 |
Model 3 | −0.03 | −0.08–0.02 | 0.23 |
Model 4 | −0.03 | −0.08–0.02 | 0.28 |
96-hour PHE volume | |||
Beta | 95% Confidence Interval | P value | |
Unadjusted | 0.02 | −0.06–0.94 | 0.64 |
Model 2 | 0.04 | −0.36–0.13 | 0.28 |
Model 3 | −0.01 | −0.07–0.05 | 0.78 |
Model 4 | −0.002 | −0.06–0.06 | 0.94 |
Multiple linear regression was used to model the association between the Fibrosis-4 score (continuous measure) and absolute admission and 96-hour perihematomal edema volumes. Model 2 was adjusted for age, sex, and race. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for serum sodium, antiplatelet use, and admission hematoma volume. Model 4 was additionally adjusted for intracerebral hemorrhage location (lobar versus deep versus infratentorial). PHE volumes were log transformed.