Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;11:3855. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83148-6

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies.

Title Author Country Year Condition N Female sex. % Mean age, years Treatment Control treatment Duration Number of prim. outcomes Primary outcome used for meta-analysis Rational for choice
Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Carvalho et al.30 Portugal 2016 Chronic low back pain 83 71 44 OLP (n = 41) Treatment as usual (n = 42) 21 days 2 Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire Most clinically relevant
Open-Label Placebo Treatment for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial Hoenemeyer et al.31 US 2018 Cancer-related fatigue 74 67 57 OLP (n = 39) Treatment as usual (n = 35) 21 days 2 Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI-14) Most clinically relvant
Altered Placebo and Drug Labeling Changes the Outcome of Episodic Migraine Attacks Kam-Hansen et al.32 US 2014 Migraine attacks 66 85 41 OLP (n = 66) No treatment (n = 66) (within subject) 7 migraine attacks 1 Change in headache, pain score Only primary outcome
Placebos without Deception: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Kaptchuk et al.21 US 2010 Irritable bowel syndrome 80 70 47 OLP (n = 37) No treatment (n = 43) 21 days 1 IBSa Global Improvement Scale Only primary outcome
Open-Label Placebo for Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Kelley et al.37 US 2012 Major depressive disorder 20 70 39 OLP (n = 11) Waitlist (n = 9) 14 days 1 17-item Hamilton scale for depression Only primary outcome
Effects of open-label placebo on pain, functional disability and spine mobility in chronic back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial Kleine-Borgmann et al.33 Germany 2019 Chronic back pain 122 72 59 OLP (n = 63) Treatment as usual (n = 59) 21 days 1 Composite pain intensity score 0–10 Only primary outcome
Open-Label placebo for the treatment of unipolar depression: Results from a randomized controlled trial. (in press) Nitzan et al.34 Israel 2020 Major depressive disorder 38 74 50 OLP (n = 18) Treatment as usual (n = 20) 28 days 1 QIDS Only primary outcome
Open-label placebos for menopausal hot flushes—a randomized controlled trial Pan et al.28 Germany 2020 Menopausal hot flushes 100 100 55 OLP (n = 50) No treatment (n = 50) 4 weeks 2 Hot flush score Most clinically relevant
Conditioned Placebo Dose Reduction: A new treatment in ADHD? Sandler et al.19 US 2010 ADHD 93 22 10 Dose reduced/Placebo (n = 33) Reduced Dose (n = 29), Full Dose (n = 31)a 8 weeks 1 IOWA Connoers Rating Scale (Parent Version) Only primary outcome (parents closer to child)
Open-label use of placebos in the treatment of ADHD: a pilot study Sandler and Bodfish20 US 2008 ADHD 26 27 Not stated (range 7 to 15) OLP (n = 26) 50% of baseline medication (n = 26) (cross-over design) 21 days 4 Seven-point clinical global impression Includes different perspectives
Open-label placebos improve symptoms in allergic rhinitis: A randomized controlled trial Schaefer et al.38 Germany 2016 Allergic Rhinitis 25 84 26 OLP (n = 12) Treatment as usual (n = 13) 14 days 2 Symptoms (self-developed questionnaire) Most clinically relevant
Why do open-label placebos work? A randomized controlled trial of an open-label placebo induction with and without extended information about the placebo effect in allergic rhinitis Schaefer et al.35 Germany 2018 Allergic Rhinitis 46 80 25 OLP with briefing (n = 13) OLP without briefing (n = 13) TAU + (n = 9), TAU- (n = 11) 14 days 2 Symptoms (self-developed questionnaire) Most clinically relevant
Open-label placebo reduces fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized trial Zhou et al.36 China 2019 Cancer-Related Fatigue 40 92 47 OLP (n = 20) No treatment (n = 20) 21 days 1 Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatique (FACIT-F) Only primary outcome

IBS irritable bowel syndrom.

a“Full dose group” was excluded. We only compared the “reduced dose” group to the “reduced dose + placebo” group, which was scored as TAU.