Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 5;7(2):e06176. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06176

Table 2.

Mean values and standard deviation of thickness (μm), moisture content (g of water/100g dry film), solubility in water (g soluble film/100g dry film), contact angle (°) and water vapor permeability (g· mm/kPa·h·m2) of the studied formulations conditioned at 53% R.H. and 25 °C.

Formulations Thickness Moisture Solubility in water Contact angle Water vapor permeability
PLA 175 ± 26a 0.36 ± 0.05a 0.30 ± 0.09a 63.3 ± 1.5d 0.36 ± 0.11a
TPS 439 ± 34c 11.0 ± 0.8d 28.4 ± 0.8c 52.3 ± 0.6a 9.43 ± 0.76d
PLA75/TPS25 198 ± 34b 3.7 ± 0.5c 6.6 ± 0.9b 61.7 ± 2.5c 2.30 ± 0.87c
PLA75/TPS25/ESO1.5 181 ± 17ab 3.1 ± 0.4bc 6.3 ± 1.7b 61.0 ± 2.6c 1.52 ± 0.33b
PLA75/TPS25/ESO3 176 ± 21a 2.7 ± 0.6b 6.7 ± 0.3b 55.5 ± 0.7b 1.36 ± 0.26b

Different superscript letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05) between formulations.