Table 3.
Challenges, scope, and future directions of teleneurorehabilitation for PD[20]
| Challenges in TNR |
| Conducting a thorough neurological examination to assess severity of tone abnormality, contractures, etc. |
| Infrastructure and cost requirements to set up a technology-driven system |
| Physician discomfort with using technology for rehabilitation services rather than the traditional doctor-patient medium |
| Designing a rehabilitation program amenable to be imparted via technology |
| Issues related to billing for services provided |
| Benefits of TNR |
| Wide outreach due to ability to cover remote areas |
| Saves on travel time, queueing time, waiting room time |
| Saves on expenses on travel and ancillary inconveniences such as arranging wheelchair, conveyance, etc. |
| Equal efficacy as in-person rehabilitation for most parameters in PD |
| High patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation |
| Scope and future directions |
| Improved Internet connectivity may lead to increased utilization of technology-driven service for neurorehabilitation even in remote regions |
| National and international experts may be available for consultation to patients without the need for travel for consultation |
| Cross-referencing services between specialties, for e.g., Neurology and Rehabilitation services, may be improved |
| Cognition and other motor and nonmotor symptoms need to be addressed via TNR |