Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;23(5):592–597. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_566_20

Table 3.

Challenges, scope, and future directions of teleneurorehabilitation for PD[20]

Challenges in TNR
 Conducting a thorough neurological examination to assess severity of tone abnormality, contractures, etc.
 Infrastructure and cost requirements to set up a technology-driven system
 Physician discomfort with using technology for rehabilitation services rather than the traditional doctor-patient medium
 Designing a rehabilitation program amenable to be imparted via technology
Issues related to billing for services provided
Benefits of TNR
 Wide outreach due to ability to cover remote areas
 Saves on travel time, queueing time, waiting room time
 Saves on expenses on travel and ancillary inconveniences such as arranging wheelchair, conveyance, etc.
 Equal efficacy as in-person rehabilitation for most parameters in PD
 High patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation
Scope and future directions
 Improved Internet connectivity may lead to increased utilization of technology-driven service for neurorehabilitation even in remote regions
 National and international experts may be available for consultation to patients without the need for travel for consultation
 Cross-referencing services between specialties, for e.g., Neurology and Rehabilitation services, may be improved
 Cognition and other motor and nonmotor symptoms need to be addressed via TNR