Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 8;36:100725. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100725

Table 2.

Operative characteristics of patients having interval cytoreductive surgery (n = 25).

Operative characteristic N (%), mean ± SD (range)
Degree of cytoreduction
  • No visible residual

  • Optimal

  • Suboptimal

  • Unresectable/aborted


  • 13 (52%)

  • 7 (28%)

  • 3 (12%)

  • 2 (8%)




Mode of operation:
  • Laparotomy

  • Laparoscopy


  • 20 (80%)

  • 5 (20%)




Hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-ophorectomy
  • Yes

  • No*


  • 23 (92%)

  • 2 (8%)




Omentectomy
  • Yes

  • No


  • 16 (64%)

  • 9 (36%)




Lymphadenectomy (pelvic or para-aortic)
  • Yes

  • No


  • 2 (8%)

  • 23 (92%)




Upper abdominal debulking
  • Yes

  • No


  • 1 (4%)

  • 24 (96%)




Additional cytoreductive procedures
  • Yes

  • No


  • 6 (24%)

  • 19 (76%)




Bowel resection (small or large bowel)
  • Yes

  • No


  • 5 (20%)

  • 20 (80%)




Number of bowel resections
  • Small bowel

  • Large bowel


  • 4

  • 3




Intra-operative complication
  • Yes

  • No


  • 1 (4%)

  • 24 (96%)




Operative time (minutes) 184 ± 76 (90–354)
Estimated blood loss (mL) 284 ± 181 (15–600)



Post-operative histology on final pathology
  • Endometrioid

  • Serous

  • Clear cell

  • Carcinosarcoma

  • Mixed

  • Other


  • 7 (28%)

  • 12 (48%)

  • 1 (4%)

  • 1 (4%)

  • 3 (12%)

  • 1 (4%)




Treatment response seen on final pathology
  • Yes

  • No

  • Not specified


  • 4 (16%)

  • 2 (8%)

  • 19 (76%)




Post-operative FIGO stage
  • IIIC2

  • IVB


  • 1 (4%)

  • 24 (96%)

SD = standard deviation, FIGO = international federation of gynecology and obstetrics.

*

Both operations aborted prior to hysterectomy due to unresectable disease.