Table 11. Comparison of Overall Performance Measures of Best Ternary Model Reported by Di et al. and Our Combined CP Workflow for Ternary Classification Applied.

	ACC	SE	SP	NPV	PPV	coverage/efficiency
Di et al.	0.71	0.61	0.83	0.84	0.68	98%
combined CP workflow at significance level of 0.3	0.73	0.70	0.86	0.84	0.64	90%
our reconstruction of the model reported by Di et al. (without AD applied)	0.70	0.60	0.83	0.83	0.67	100%