Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 10;41(6):1340–1348. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0873-20.2020

Table 3.

Post hoc analyses for all TRs showing significant differences in the hippocampus for adaptive versus maladaptive trials

Contrast TR
9 10 12 13 14
Adaptive > baseline mean (SE) −1.0 (4.1) −2.1 (3.7) 4.6 (2.8) 4.2 (2.1) −0.3 (2.4)
Maladaptive > baseline mean (SE) 5.5 (5.2) 2.9 (4.1) −5.9 (3.2) −5.7 (3.3) −5.2 (3.1)
Adaptive vs. maladaptive t test (p value) −2.5 (0.02) −2.6 (0.02) 4.1 (0.001) 3.5 (0.002) 2.5 (0.02)
Adaptive vs novel t test (p value) −1.9 (0.06) −1.3 (0.19) 3.7 (0.002) 3.1 (0.006) 1.0 (0.34)
Maladaptive vs novel t test (p value) 1.15 (0.26) 1.48 (0.15) −1.14 (0.26) −1.09 (0.29) −1.28 (0.22)
[Adapt > maladapt] ∼ adaptive behavior r value (p value) −0.39 (0.09) −0.5 (0.02) −0.12 (0.61) −0.1 (0.68) −0.14 (0.54)

Reported values include the mean β-parameters for each condition against baseline, t tests between adaptive and maladaptive trials, t tests between adaptive/maladaptive versus novel trials, and regressions between β-parameters of adaptive > maladaptive and adaptive behavioral responses. For t tests, positive values represent relative enhancement signals and negative values represent relative suppression signals.