Table 3.
Item-level statistics and inclusion criteria for selected items.
Item statistic | Inclusion criteria for dichotomous items | Inclusion criteria for ordinal items |
---|---|---|
CTT difficulty. The proportion of examinees answering the item correctly | Items with difficulty between 0.10 and 0.90 were included | Items with <0.90 of the cases scoring on either the highest or lowest answer options were included |
CTT discrimination. It refers to the item's capacity to distinguish examinees with high and low ability based on their total score |
|
|
Item contribution to internal consistency. Each item contributes to increase or decrease the internal consistency depending on its amount of covariance with other items measuring a common developmental domain | Items that increase Cronbach's Alpha coefficient when included as part of the developmental domain | Items that increase Cronbach's Alpha coefficient when included as part of the developmental domain |
Developmental domain internal structure. Items should be associated with the domain they intend to measure. CFA techniques empirically determined this relationship |
|
|
Relationship with age. Given its association with psychological development, age could be considered an external criterion to identify items that intend to measure development |
|
|
IRT estimates. These additional item level statistics inform about optimal difficulty or discrimination |
|
|
“1PL” and “2PL” refer to the Rasch and two-parameter logistic IRT models. “CFA” refers to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.