Table 2.
Biomarkers for outcome following cardiac arrest with therapeutic hypothermia treatment
Authors/year/Ref | Study design | Population | N | Bio-marker | Sample source | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tiainen/2003/[27] | RCT | Witnessed VF or VT arrest, ≤60 min between collapse to ROSC | 70 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Cronberg/2011/[29] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest with GCS <8 after ROSC | 111 | NSE | Serum |
|
Rundgren/2009/[25] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, GCS ≤7 | 107 | NSE, s100β | Serum |
|
Daubin/2011/[24] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, comatose >48 h | 97 | NSE | Serum |
|
Shinozaki/2009/[23] | Pro | In- or out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest with ROSC >20 min, with GCS ≤8 | 80 | NSE, s100μ | Serum |
|
Stammet/2013/[28] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest | 75 | NSE, s100μ | Serum |
|
Rossetti/2012/[21] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest, comatose | 61 | NSE | Serum |
|
Mortberg/2011/[30] | Pro | Post cardiac arrest, SBP >80 mmHg x > 5 min, GCS ≤7, <6 h following ROSC | 31 | NSE, s100β, BDNF, GFAP | Serum |
|
PPV positive predictive value, Pro prospective observational, RCT randomized controlled trial, ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, TH therapeutic hypothermia, VF ventricular fibrillation, VT ventricular tachycardia