Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e044462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044462

Table 4.

Reported adherence within fidelity domains across studies (score awarded/applicable score) and final score (percentage of score awarded/applicable score)

Article Study design Training of providers Treatment delivery Treatment
receipt
Treatment enactment Overall score
Bennell et al35 78% (25/32) 21% (3/14) 78% (14/18) 20% (2/10) 0% (0/4) 56% (44/78)
Cloke et al36 40% (19/48) 0% (0/14) 0% (0/18) 0% (0/10) 0% (0/4) 20% (19/94)
Dickens et al37 21% (5/24) 0% (0/12) 0% (0/18) 50% (5/10) 25% (1/4) 9% (6/68)
Ginn and Cohen38 43% (18/42) 7% (1/14) 0% (0/18) 50% (5/10) 0% (0/4) 32% (24/74)
Haahr et al39 35% (12/34) 0% (0/14) 11% (2/18) 10% (1/10) 0% (0/4) 19% (15/80)
Hay et al40 50% (17/34) 0% (0/14) 11% (2/18) 10% (1/10) 0% (0/4) 25% (20/80)
Kachingwe et al41 48% (24/50) 10% (1/10) 11% (2/18) 0% (0/10) 0% (0/4) 29% (27/92)
Rhon et al42 68% (23/34) 21% (3/14) 0% (0/18) 0% (0/10) 0% (0/4) 32% (26/80)
Szczurko et al43 70% (24/34) 10% (0/14) 28% (5/18) 0% (0/10) 0% (0/4) 36% (29/80)
Winters et al44 57% (24/42) 7% (1/14) 10% (0/18) 0% (0/10) 0% (0/4) 28% (25/88)
Average score 51% 8% 15% 14% 2.5% 29%