Table 1.

Review eligibility criteria based on study population, concept, context and types of evidence

	Inclusion	Exclusion
Population	Human participants of any description (eg, adults, children, adolescents, older adults, populations with a particular health or medical condition, healthy people) Human samples (eg, tissue samples, genetic material). Analysis of historical datasets (eg, health records, epidemiological datasets).	Evaluations of new technologies that do not include human participants (eg, evaluating tensile properties of a new fabric, developing a new medical diagnostic kit/device without in-human testing)
Concept	Studies that refer to the concept of precision health or its derivatives (eg, personalised health, individualised health, stratified health, tailored health) Any study collecting health-related clinical, psychosocial, or behavioural information (eg, weight loss, disease prevalence/risk, physical activity, mental health)	Animal studies, in silico studies, and testing of materials for precision health applications Non-health outcomes including economic outcomes (eg, cost-effectiveness studies), human/sports performance outcomes (eg, physical conditioning programmes for healthy athletes)
Context	Any geographical location or setting of any nature (including online studies)	None
Types of evidence	Primary empirical research studies, (eg, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and case reports). Protocols for planned studies Full-text articles Full-text conference proceedings Articles written in English Patents	Reviews (eg, systematic reviews, narrative reviews) Editorial articles (eg, perspective pieces, position statements) Abstracts or posters Articles for which we cannot obtain the full text or that are not written in English Dissertations