Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;6(2):e003850. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003850

Table 1.

Luke’s three faces of power and the CDoH

Three ‘faces’ of power Mechanisms Example
Instrumental Exerts direct influence on decision makers, for example, via lobbying, campaign contributions, revolving door; highlights relationships commercial actors have with other stakeholders involved in policy making In 2013, the American soft drink industry (Coca-Cola, PepsiCo and the American Beverage Association) spent $10.9 million dollars lobbying the US government.82
Structural Influences the agenda-setting process that precedes decision making (‘non-decision-making power’) and can limit the range of choices available to policy makers; can also involve the acquisition of decision-making power via self-regulation The political and economic importance of Mexico and Brazil’s sugar cane industries influenced government’s unwillingness to regulate the food industry.83
Discursive Influences norms and ideas that underpin and precede agenda setting and political decision-making; shapes public opinion of issues and non-issues The European Union lobby group FoodDrinkTax portrayed a sugar tax as a ‘nanny state’ intervention that limits ‘personal freedom’.84