Table 3. Parameter estimates for the three model fits for the Uganda data set.
| LC | LCRE | FM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence | 0.47 (0.03) | 0.48 (0.03) | 0.52 (0.05) |
| Sensitivities | |||
| POC-CCA | 0.98 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.02) |
| SEA-ELISA | 0.98 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.01) | 0.98 (0.02) |
| DNA-TaqMan | 0.92 (0.03) | 0.92 (0.03) | 0.88 (0.04) |
| Kato-Katz 1 | 0.79 (0.04) | 0.79 (0.04) | 0.73 (0.06) |
| Kato-Katz 2 | 0.79 (0.04) | 0.79 (0.04) | 0.72 (0.06) |
| Specificities | |||
| POC-CCA | 0.80 (0.04) | 0.81 (0.04) | 0.88 (0.06) |
| SEA-ELISA | 0.46 (0.04) | 0.46 (0.04) | 0.51 (0.05) |
| DNA-TaqMan | 0.55 (0.04) | 0.55 (0.05) | 0.56 (0.05) |
| Kato-Katz 1 | 0.99 (0.01) | 1.00 (0.01) | 0.99 (0.01) |
| Kato-Katz 2 | 0.99 (0.01) | 1.00 (0.01) | 0.99 (0.01) |
The table shows the estimated prevalences, sensitivities and specificities with standard errors in parentheses for the Uganda data set.