Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;15(2):e0009042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009042

Table 4. Fitted frequencies for the three model fits for the Uganda data set.

Pattern Observed LC LCRE FM
1 00000 39 26.81 27.48 29.89
2 00100 20 22.11 22.42 23.76
3 01000 22 31.48 32.22 29.06
4 01011 1 0.14 0.12 0.22
5 01100 28 26.05 26.38 23.29
6 01101 1 0.7 0.43 0.88
7 10000 1 6.62 6.46 4.08
8 10100 2 5.55 5.36 3.43
9 10110 2 0.45 0.38 0.61
10 11000 13 8.18 7.97 5.1
11 11001 2 1.72 1.59 3.13
12 11010 1 1.72 1.59 3.16
13 11011 5 6.2 5.98 8.16
14 11100 18 11.04 10.9 11.66
15 11101 14 17.69 17.97 22.42
16 11110 14 17.83 18.05 22.65
17 11111 75 67.27 68.45 59.31
X2 36.93 40.25 44.42

The table shows the observed and expected frequencies under the three model fits for the Uganda data set. As in Table 2, the expected frequencies under the FM model fit for the all zero and all one responses only show the non-deterministic component.