Table 4. Fitted frequencies for the three model fits for the Uganda data set.
Pattern | Observed | LC | LCRE | FM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 00000 | 39 | 26.81 | 27.48 | 29.89 |
2 | 00100 | 20 | 22.11 | 22.42 | 23.76 |
3 | 01000 | 22 | 31.48 | 32.22 | 29.06 |
4 | 01011 | 1 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
5 | 01100 | 28 | 26.05 | 26.38 | 23.29 |
6 | 01101 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.43 | 0.88 |
7 | 10000 | 1 | 6.62 | 6.46 | 4.08 |
8 | 10100 | 2 | 5.55 | 5.36 | 3.43 |
9 | 10110 | 2 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.61 |
10 | 11000 | 13 | 8.18 | 7.97 | 5.1 |
11 | 11001 | 2 | 1.72 | 1.59 | 3.13 |
12 | 11010 | 1 | 1.72 | 1.59 | 3.16 |
13 | 11011 | 5 | 6.2 | 5.98 | 8.16 |
14 | 11100 | 18 | 11.04 | 10.9 | 11.66 |
15 | 11101 | 14 | 17.69 | 17.97 | 22.42 |
16 | 11110 | 14 | 17.83 | 18.05 | 22.65 |
17 | 11111 | 75 | 67.27 | 68.45 | 59.31 |
X2 | 36.93 | 40.25 | 44.42 |
The table shows the observed and expected frequencies under the three model fits for the Uganda data set. As in Table 2, the expected frequencies under the FM model fit for the all zero and all one responses only show the non-deterministic component.