TABLE 2.

APDiD of IYCF counseling coverage among caregivers of children aged 12–23 mo between intervention (Amuria) and nonintervention (Soroti) districts: IYCF/micronutrient powder intervention baseline survey 2015 and endline survey 2016, Amuria and Soroti districts, Uganda¹

	APDiD (95% CI)	P
Received IYCF counseling by VHT worker
Base model	51.6 (44.0, 59.2)	<0.0001
Adjusted model	51.6 (44.0, 59.2)	<0.0001
Received IYCF counseling by health center staff
Base model	−0.9 (−8.9, 7.1)	0.8
Adjusted model	−1.0 (−9.0, 6.9)	0.8

¹Unweighted sample sizes are 2814 (counseling by VHT) and 2813 (counseling by health center staff). Base model estimates are the difference in the prevalence (95% CI) for exposure to the IYCF/MNP intervention controlling for fixed effects of district (Amuria vs. Soroti), year (2016 vs. 2015), child sex, and age group (12–17 mo vs. 18–23 mo). The adjusted model additionally controls for household wealth tertile, severe household food insecurity, and caregiver schooling level (less than primary education vs. primary or higher). CIs account for weighting and complex sampling design. APDiD, adjusted prevalence difference-in-difference; IYCF, infant and young child feeding; MNP, micronutrient powder; VHT, village health team.