Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb 15;14(2):e011739. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011739

Table 1:

Baseline Characteristics (N=317)

Normal LV systolic function (n=244, 77%) Occult LV systolic dysfunction (n=44, 14%) Overt LV systolic dysfunction (n=27, 6%) p p*
Age, years 37 (26–47) 38 (29–49) 39 (28–51) 0.7 0.9
Male 103 (42%) 19 (43%) 11 (41%) 0.6 0.8
Body mass index, kg/m2 26±5 27±6 28±3 0.1 0.3
Prior tricuspid valve surgery 49 (21%) 11 (16%) 9 (13%) 0.6 0.9
NYHA I 24 (11%) [n=215] 1 (3%) [n=38] --- 0.1 ---
NYHA II 123 (57%) [n=215] 12 (32%) [n=38] 9 (26%) [n=26] 0.004 0.8
NYHA III-IV 68 (32%) [n=215] 25 (66%) [n=38] 17 (65%) [n=26] 0.001 0.9
Comorbidities
Atrial flutter/tachycardia 39 (16%) 14 (32%) 7 (26%) 0.01 0.3
Atrial fibrillation 34 (14%) 18 (41%) 13 (48%) <0.001 0.4
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia 7 (3%) 2 (5%) 1 (4%) 0.6 0.9
Hypertension 41 (17%) 7 (16%) 5 (19%) 0.5 0.8
Coronary artery disease 6 (3%) 2 (5%) 2 (8%) 0.6 0.7
Medications
Loop diuretics 39 (16%) 14 (32%) 10 (37%) 0.01 0.2
Beta blockers 47 (19%) 18 (41%) 21 (78%) <0.001 <0.001
ACEI/ARB 24 (10%) 14 (32%) 20 (74%) <0.001 <0.001
Aldosterone antagonist --- 7 (16%) 19 (33%) --- 0.08

NYHA: New York Heart Association; ACEI: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: Angiotensin II receptor blockers;

p value denotes comparison between Normal LV systolic function and Occult LV systolic dysfunction groups while p* denotes comparison between Occult LV systolic dysfunction and Overt LV systolic function groups