Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;105:144–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.052

Table 1.

Comparison of rapid antigen tests of four different distributors

Test distributora PCR Ct ≤ 25 PCR Ct ≤ 30 PCR Ct > 30 PPV (CI) PCR Ct cutoff 30 Total number of samples
N (Ag+/Ag−) % positive
(95% CI)
N (Ag+/Ag−) % positive
(95% CI)
N (Ag+/Ag−) % positive PPV (CI 95%)
Abbotta 18 (15/3) 83.3%(58.6–96.4%) 39 (31/8) 79.5% (63.5–90.7%) 43 (11/32) 25.6% 73.8 (62.3–82.8%) 82
CLMSRDLa 10 (6/4) 60%(26.2–87.8%) 31 (14/17) 45.2%(27.3–64.0%) 54 (5/49) 9.3% 73.7 (52.7–87.6%) 85
DIALABa 12 (12/0) 100%(73.5–100%) 36 (32/4) 88.9%(73.9–96.9%) 63 (29/34) 46.0% 52.5 (45.2–59.6%) 99
Rochea 9 (9/0) 100%(66.4–100%) 32 (27/5) 84.4%(67.2–94.7%) 39 (16/23) 41.0% 62.8 (53.0–71.7%) 71

Confidence intervals (CI 95%) for antigen tests sensitivities in relation to ct values ≤25 and ≤30 are given in parentheses. Sensitivity and positive predictive value infections (PPV) using PCR Ct values as reference (>30 defined as non-infectious and ≤30 and ≤25 as infectious); N = number.

a

For details of tests, see Methods section.