Table 3.
Procedural characteristics
Study | Rodriguez et al |
Williams et al |
Pelargonio et al |
Kempa et al |
Kutarski et al |
El-Chami et al |
Yagishita et al |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Old | Young | Old | Young | Old | Young | Old | Young | Old | Young | Old | Young | Old | Young | |
Patients, n | 118 | 388 | 72 | 334 | 150 | 699 | 26 | 134 | 192 | 1060 | 100 | 674 | 51 | 184 |
Procedure time | NR | NR | 88±53 | 92±52 | NR | NR | NR | NR | 104±46 | 111±48 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Technique | ||||||||||||||
MT | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 35 (49) | 168 (50) | 26 (17) | 109 (15) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 42 (42) | 277 (41) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
LS | 118 (100) | 388 (100) | 37 (51) | 166 50) | 124 (83) | 578 (83) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 41 (41) | 304 (45) | 44 (86) | 165 (90) |
MS | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0 0 | 0 (0) | 12 (2) | NR | NR | NR | NR | 17 (17) | 93 (14) | 7 (14) | 19 (10) |
Leads extracted | ||||||||||||||
Total | 253 | 814 | 141 | 657 | 301 | 1410 | 35 | 185 | 2137 | 1078 | 170 | NR | NR | |
Atrial | 99 (39) | 295 (36) | 57 (40) | 254 (39) | 97 (32) | 484 (34) | 12 (34) | 65 (35) | 914 (43) | NR | NR | NR | NR | |
Ventricular | 145 (57) | 442 (54) | 70 (50) | 344 (52) | 166 (55) | 753 (53) | 23 (66) | 116 (63) | 1145 (54) | NR | NR | NR | NR | |
CS | 9 (4) | 77 (10) | 14 (10) | 59 (9) | 38 (13) | 173 (13) | 0 (0) | 4 (2) | 78 (3) | NR | NR | NR | NR | |
Approach | ||||||||||||||
Subclavian | 116 (98) | 379 (98) | 70 (97) | 331 (97) | NR | NR | 25 (96) | 131 (98) | NR | NR | 96 (96) | 640 (95) | NR | NR |
Femoral | 2 (2) | 9 (2) | 2 (3) | 11 (3) | NR | NR | 1 (4) | 3 (2) | NR | NR | 4 (4) | 34 (5) | NR | NR |
Values presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables.
CS = coronary sinus; LS = laser sheath; MS = mechanical sheath; MT = manual traction; NR = not reported.