Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2021 Jan 12;1867(4):166078. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166078

Figure 3. LPC (16:0) levels change in proportion to BM performance.

Figure 3.

(A) Latency to find the escape hole during memory test in BM. 2-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD posttest (*p≤0.05 vs SW) († p = 0.09 vs SW). (B) Correlation analysis using the latency as a variable versus the concentration of LPC (16:0) (Pearson correlation, R=0.44, p=0.03). (C) Correlation analysis using the latency as a variable versus the concentration of CE (20:4) (Pearson correlation, R=0.22, p=0.32)