Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;70(2):265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02684-8

Table 1.

Study demographics

Author Year Treatment Dosage Control Phase N (T) N (C) Age (T/C) (median) Sex (T/C) Favorable (T/C) Intermediate (T/C) Poor (T/C) Component
Rini 2019 Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab A 200 mg, B 15 mg/kg S 50 mg 3 454 461 62/60 318/350 89/90 311/318 54/53 CC or Sa
Rini 2016 IMA901 plus sunitinib I 4.13 mg, S 50 mg S 50 mg 3 204 135 61/60 142/88 56/35 145/96 3/4 CC
Motzer 2013 Pazopanib 800 mg S 50 mg 3 557 553 61/62 398/415 151/152 322/328 110/85 CC
Plimack 2020 Pembrolizumab and axitinib P 200 mg, Ax 5 mg S 50 mg 3 432 429 62/61 308/320 138/131 238/246 56/52 CC or Sa
Motzer 2019 Nivolumab plus ipilimumab N 3 mg/kg, Ip 1 mg/kg S 50 mg 3 550 546 62/62 413/395 125/124 334/333 91/89 CC or Sa
Motzer 2019 Avelumab plus axitinib Av 10 mg/kg, Ax 5 mg S 50 mg 3 442 444 62/61 316/344 96/100 283/293 51/45 CC

A Atezolizumab, Av avelumab, Ax axitinib, B bevacizumab, C control, CC clear cell, I IMA901, Ip ipilimumab, N nivolumab, P pembrolizumab, S sunitinib, Sa sarcomatoid, T treatment