A comparative study on the chloride effectiveness of synthetic rutile and natural rutile manufactured from ilmenite ore

Abstract

Studies on continuous and selective chlorination by using ilmenite have been actively conducted because the efficient removal of FeO from ilmenite(FeTiO₃) ore using selective chlorination not only improves the reaction purity of TiCl₄ but it also leads to price competitiveness compared to TiCl₄ synthesized from natural rutile. The chlorination of synthetic rutile with FeO removed was compared with that of natural rutile to examine the reaction efficiency. The selective chlorination efficiency depends on the input amounts of coke and Cl₂, as shown by thermodynamic calculation, when FeO is selectively removed. It was found that manufacturing of TiCl₄ was easier by using the synthetic rutile, because it had greater porosity than natural rutile. Relatively greater pore volumes were found in the synthetic rutile than in natural rutile. It was confirmed that the reaction efficiency of chlorination for TiCl₄ production was directly related to the difference in the porosity distribution between the titanium ores, as verified by a kinetic comparison of synthetic and natural rutiles.

Introduction

Ilmenite(FeTiO₃) ore is a raw material for producing TiCl₄ through the chlorination method and the sulfuric acid reaction method. TiCl₄ is used as a raw material for producing metallic titanium through the Kroll process or for producing TiO₂ used as a catalyst or pigment^1–5. Until now, high-grade rutile ore has been used for manufacturing TiCl₄. The advantages of having low prices and extensive reserves have led to active research using the ilmenite ore. To produce TiCl₄ using ilmenite ore, it is important to secure high-quality TiO₂ by removing FeO from the ore^6–8. Hydrometallurgical methods to produce TiCl₄ include the Ishihara method that uses sulfuric acid, the Benilite and Murso methods that uses hydrochloric acid⁹, and the Becher method that uses NH₄Cl + HCl¹⁰. Sneha Samal^11,12 evaluated that the titania slag is dissolved by using ethylene glycol or resorcinol. The upgraded feed stock was obtained by control of acid concentration, pulp density, grain size and time. Alternatively, Paliyaguru et al.¹³ recently manufactured TiO₂ nanoparticles with gravity separation properties using H₃PO₄ acid in ilmenite ore. Wu et al.¹⁴ manufactured TiO₂ with hydrolysis of TiCl₄ using AlCl₃. This makes use of rutile's high chromium absorption capacity, which also helps to solve water pollution. Ma et al.¹⁵ evaluated the efficiency of application of titanium industries through structural evaluation using viscous properties of high titanium slag. In this way, research on the recovery of titanium through wet reactions is active in trying a different reaction method than in the past. In addition, the dry smelting method in titanium research has the advantage of having fewer by-products compared to wet smelting methods. Therefore, the active progress of researchers on reaction testing is meaningful in order to increase the industrial application efficiency of titanium.

As a dry method, upgrade slag (UGS) can be obtained by separating slag containing TiO₂ from pig iron through reduction of FeO_x in an electric furnace¹⁶; however, reducing the FeO from the ilmenite ore at 1550–1600 °C causes the gradually concentrated TiO₂ to lose fluidity due to its high melting point, so there is a limit to obtaining high purity TiO₂.

Producing TiCl₄ using ilmenite ore is more economical than using natural rutile because the price of ilmenite is approximately four times lower¹⁷. However, to produce TiCl₄ from ilmenite ore using selective chlorination, technical factors must also be examined. These include the roasting process for the phase control of FeO_x present in the ore, the derivation of high-purity TiO₂ production conditions for the selective chlorination of FeO. The synthetic rutile fabricated through the selective chlorination of FeO may have large benefits in terms of the reaction efficiency because its porosity is higher than that of natural rutile.

Synthetic rutile refers to TiO₂ that remains in the ilmenite after FeO is removed. Synthetic rutile is more porous than natural rutile, owing to the removal of FeO from the matrix. To identify an appropriate chlorination process, it is essential to compare reactivity through a quantitative evaluation of the porosity and reactive efficiency by rutile species. Furthermore, the observation of morphology is essential to evaluate the reaction efficiency of chlorine reactions in synthetic/natural rutile. As part of this review, Li et al.¹⁸ conducted structural considerations on the reaction with XRD and FT-IR in the process of recovering vanadium and chromium through microwave absorption characteristics and thermal behavior evaluation of vanadium slag. Chen et al.¹⁹ recovered Cr, V using sodium carbonate roasting for high-purity shuttle production. We consider the analysis of phase changes through XRD, SEM, and Raman analyses. Kang et al.²⁰ also considered the behavior of rutile and sodium carbonate reactions in the microwave heating reaction through structural evaluation. Thus, morphology evaluation by structural analysis are essential factors in assessing the chemical reaction. In this study, the FeO with selective chlorination by using coke and Cl₂ gas of ilmenite ore was eliminated, and TiO₂ of high purity produced. The reaction characteristics based on changes in porosity were investigated by comparing the efficiency of the chloride reaction with natural rutile of high purity.

Material and methods

The ilmenite ore (Shijiazhuang Lanhu Welding Consumables Co., Ltd., China) and coke (Fushun Fangda High Tech Material Co., Ltd., China, 0.03wt% FeO_x-0.09wt% SiO₂-0.04wt% Al₂O₃-99.36wt% C-0.48wt% S) were prepared for the synthetic rutile manufacturing.

The average diameter of ilmenite ore and coke was 214 and 803 μm, respectively. And the synthetic rutile was produced through the reaction with chloride gas. To exclude reaction and influence of moisture during chlorination process, ilmenite and coke were first dried in a furnace at 150 °C for 24 h. A fluidized bed reactor(FBR) for chloride process was used. The inner dimeter of the FBR is 2.54 cm, and the tube is 70 cm high. We used 46.73 g of ilmenite ore, which met our length to diameter requirement (L/D = 3).

The coke was injected by relying on the stoichiometry ratio of FeO contained in the ilmenite ore.

Thus, FeO in ilmenite and coke were maintained at a ratio of 1:1. The 3.70 g of coke was added to meet the 1:1 M ratio for FeO_x in ilmenite and coke to suit selective chlorination. The coke used in the experiment was assumed to be all carbon because of high purity coke (contains more than 99% carbon composition).

The reaction temperature was set to 1173 K and it was increased at a rate of approximately 15 K/min; nitrogen was continuously injected at a rate of 300 ml/min to maintain fluidization of the ore. When the set temperature was reached, the inputted nitrogen gas was stopped. Chlorine gas was injected at a flow rate of 851 ml/min for the selective chlorination process. The minimum fluidization velocity was calculated using the Wen&Yu equation²¹, and the minimum fluidization velocity for each ilmenite and coke was calculated as the ratio of the raw material. Experimentally confirmed that the minimum fluidization velocity should be approximately twice through the cold test, and if it is higher than twice, the ilmenite and coke will be separated, and if it is lower than twice, the injection material will not be mixed. Therefore, the flow velocity could be twice the minimum fluidization velocity. To compare the chlorination behavior under the same FeO content included in natural rutile, the selective chlorination time was controlled to 40 min for a preliminary test. The synthetic rutile, which was produced through the chlorination of ilmenite ore, and natural rutile ore (Vol'nogorsk Mining, Ukraine) were mixed with coke for 30 min to observe the reaction surface after chlorination process. The particle sizes of the two rutile types ranged from 180 to 210 µm. After the stoichiometric mixture (rutile:coke = 1:2 mol) was left for 30 min for reaction, the supply of Cl₂ at 1173 K was stopped and Ar gas was inputted into the reaction tube to remove the remaining Cl₂ gas. The TiCl₄ was acquired by a temperature controlled receiver with cooling water. The discharged unreacted Cl₂ gas was sent into NaOH aqueous solution to be neutralized and then discharged to the atmosphere.

The selective chlorination of FeO from FeTiO₃ ore is performed according to the following process in Eq. (1). The following reaction confirmed that selective removal was completed after 40 min of chlorination. Information of composition on the types of ore is given in Table 1.

$${\text{FeTiO}}_3+\text{C}+1.{\text{5Cl}}_2\to {\text{FeCl}}_3+{\text{TiO}}_2+\text{CO}$$ 1

Table 1.

Chemical compositions of ilmenite, synthetic rutile, and natural rutile (wt%).

Content (wt%)	TiO2	FeOx	SiO2	Al2O3	Cr2O3	MgO	MnO	CaO
Ilmenite	53.59	36.9	3.41	1.97	1.00	0.90	1.23	0.20
*Synthetic rutile	86.7	2.08	4.69	2.22	1.07	0.86	0.05	0.27
Natural rutile	92.5	1.65	2.47	1.01	0.13	0.11	0.06	0.05

*Synthetic rutile: obtained by selective chlorination from ilmenite (after 40 min at 1173 K).

Later, TiCl₄ was produced from the synthetic and natural rutile through the following chemical reaction in Eq. (2). After the reaction, the reaction efficiency was compared by measuring the weight of the residue in Eq. (3).

$${\text{TiO}}_2+\text{2C}+{\text{2Cl}}_2\to {\text{TiCl}}_4+\text{2CO}$$ 2

$$\mathrm{Reaction}\mathrm{efficiency}\left(\%\right)=\frac{m_0-m}{m_0}\times 100$$ 3

(m₀ : initial mass of sample, m : mass of residue).

After completion of the experiment, the remaining reactants were collected and weighed, and then the surface of the residue was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL, JSM-6610LV). Later, the porosities of the ores were measured using a specific surface area analyzer (Tristar II 3020, Micromeritics) to compare the synthetic rutile with the natural rutile. The microstructures of the ores were observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai OSIRIS).

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the phase diagram of FeO-Fe2O3-TiO2 by Meinhold²², and I redrew it again. It shows that the phase can vary depending on each stoichiometric state. Phases such as FeO, Fe₂O₃, TiO₂, and Fe₂TiO₅, in addition to FeTiO₃, can exist together for ilmenite ore. The presence of such multiple phases not only lowers the reaction efficiency but also makes it difficult to realize selective chlorination due to the existence of phases, such as Fe₃O₄ that is particularly difficult to reduce. For this reason, many researchers have performed chlorination after roasting the ilmenite to increase the reaction efficiency. The FeO in ilmenite (FeTiO₃) is theoretically FeO; however, the actual phase shows that the ore contains FeO, Fe₂O₃, Fe₃O₄, and so on, making it a difficult reduction condition. The order of reduction efficiency is as follows: FeO > Fe₂O₃ > Fe₃O₄; This is determinated to be due to volumetric expansion changes depending on the difference in the crystal structure when each oxide reacts with the reducing agent^23–26.

Figure 1.

FeO-Fe₂O₃-TiO₂ ternary system.

Most of these are mixed with FeO and Fe₂O₃ and become Fe₃O₄. The chlorination reaction of Fe₃O₄ phase reduces the removal efficiency from ilmenite ore. Therefore, it becomes an issue because the efficiency of the roasting process for controlling the FeO_x phase and the process time accordingly depend on selective chlorination of FeO in ilmenite ore.

Gan et al. examined the oxidation path by roasting ilmenite ore and reported that the path varied depending on the oxidation roasting conditions of below 825 °C or above 950 °C²⁷. Fu et al. controlled the temperature, particle size, and oxygen partial pressure of ilmenite ore and observed the phase transitions for reaction mechanism of ilmenite oxidation²⁸. They reported that ilmenite ore can exist as TiO₂, Fe₂O₃, Fe₂Ti₃O₉, and Fe₂TiO₅ depending on the reactor conditions. Allen observed the magnetic properties of ilmenite using magnetic attraction and rotation separation and derived the conditions of magnetic rotation separation through the particle rotation of the ilmenite sample at each temperature while the temperature was varied from 450 to 650 °C²⁹. As the chlorination efficiency actually depends on the remaining magnetic oxides in ilmenite, iron oxides can be pretreated in the form of hematite.

As mentioned, many researchers have reviewed the FeO_x phase control in the ilmenite ore and thus can acquire efficient synthetic rutile. In addition, even if the phase of the FeO_x is controlled, reaction behavior may vary depending on the ratio of the coke and chlorine gas injected with the ilmenite ore. Thus, iron chloride is made at FeCl₂ and FeCl₃, depending on the amount of chlorine gas injected, and relatively large coke and chlorine injections may not be selective chloride. The reaction formula for the injection of coke and chlorine was shown in Eqs. (1), (4) and (5).

$${\text{FeTiO}}_3+\text{C}+{\text{Cl}}_2\to {\text{FeCl}}_2+{\text{TiO}}_2+\text{CO}$$ 4

$${\text{FeTiO}}_3+\text{3C}+3.{\text{5Cl}}_2\to {\text{FeCl}}_3+{\text{TiCl}}_4+\text{3CO}$$ 5

When FeTiO₃ was inputted, the synthetic rutile made by the chlorination of the mixture of the ore and coke were obtained.

Thermodynamic calculation using HSC Chemistry v.9.0 software as inputted materials is shown in Fig. 2. HSC chemistry is a software that can thermodynamically identify the stabilization of responses under a given condition by calculating Gibb’s free energy. Figure 2a,b show that different products were generated depending on the stoichiometric input of FeTiO₃, C, and Cl₂, and the optimal conditions for generation of FeCl₂ by selective chlorination and the mixed reaction up to TiCl₄ were determined. If the inputted FeTiO₃, C, and Cl₂ are reactivated within a given temperature range, the stabilization phase can be verified, and optionally the conditions for removing FeO can be determined. As indicated by the results, this depends on the injection mole ratio of the reducing agent (coke) and Cl₂ gas, and not the main factor for temperature control in the operation process. Depending on the injection mole ratio, the loss of TiO₂ may or may not occur at the same time as the FeO is removed. As shown in Fig. 2, the progress temperature for removing FeO exceeded 900 °C, and ferrous chloride was gasified.

Figure 2.

Equilibrium state of ilmenite and rutile ore with varying input amounts of coke and chloride gas.

Kang et al. examined the conditions for deriving selective phases through the control of the chlorine partial pressure, oxygen partial pressure, and temperature^30,31. They stated that the selective chlorination of FeCl₂ was possible when log P_Cl2 was controlled between − 10 and 0 atm at 1100 K and that it is important to fabricate TiCl₄ using high-purity synthetic rutile residue after selective chlorination. Actually, the generated phase was different depending on the partial pressure of the chlorine. As this is directly related to the purity of the product and synthetic rutile residue, the control of the input amounts is very important. As shown in Fig. 2c, TiCl₄ can be produced through the chlorination of rutile with coke and chlorine, and the reaction efficiency can be examined through the thermodynamic driving force. Although the synthetic rutile and natural rutile have the same chemical formula and crystal structure, they have different internal microstructure, resulting in different reaction efficiency. In the case of the synthetic rutile, the initial FeO was selectively chlorinated and removed as FeCl₂ or FeCl₃, resulting in increased porosity; this porosity facilitates chlorine penetration. Figure 3 shows the reaction efficiency of the synthetic and natural rutile after chlorination for 30 min. Swanepoel observed the change in the shell reaction considering the shrinking-core model for the pore diffusion in the ore by hydrochloric acid³². The reaction efficiency was examined by kinetic considerations of temperature, particle size, and molar ratios of the synthetic rutile (Fig. 3a) and natural rutile (Fig. 3b), as shown in Fig. 3. Synthetic rutile were manufactured by chloride reactions from the ilmenite ore, and the particle size of the synthetic rutile was 125 µm after a 30-min chloride reaction. The natural rutile is 120 µm, but it means that the difference in particle size in the evaluation of the chloride reactions of two types of rutiles has been ignored. After chlorination process, there was a difference in the reaction efficiency. This appears to be because of the difference in the internal porosity.

Figure 3.

Weight change rate of synthetic rutile and natural rutile after chlorination.

Figure 4 shows the surface morphology of the raw and chlorinated ores. The particle sizes of the raw ilmenite were not significantly different from those of the ilmenite selectively chlorinated for 40 min to remove FeO by mixing coke (comparison between Fig. 4a,b). However, the surface roughness of the synthetic rutile chlorinated for 30 min to produce TiCl₄ (Fig. 4b) was significantly different from that of the raw natural rutile (Fig. 4d). Kim was investigated that microstructure changes in ilmenite occurring after selective chlorination. In other words, it was noted that the change in the size of the pores due to selective chloride reactions has a significant effect on the response efficiency for TiCl₄ manufacturing. However, there was no pore comparison with natural rutile³³. Sohn and Zhou also reported that the chlorination efficiency of the synthetic rutile selectively chlorinated from ilmenite ore was higher than that of natural rutile due to the influence of pores³⁴. They, however, did not consider the application of the shrinking-core model, unlike Swanepoel³². They mentioned that this was because pore diffusion was partially generated by chemical reactions in the particles. The reaction efficiency of the synthetic rutile with higher porosity due to the removal of FeO (Fig. 4c) was higher than that of the natural rutile (Fig. 4e), and thus chlorination was accelerated for the synthetic rutile. This was consistent with the reaction results of Fig. 3 and the results of Sohn and Zhou (1999).

Figure 4.

SEM images of surface morphology for (a) raw ilmenite and (b) ilmenite chlorinated for 40 min (c) synthetic rutile chlorinated for 30 min (d) raw natural rutile (e) natural rutile chlorinated for 30 min.

TiCl₄, manufactured by chloride reaction using synthetic rutile and natural rutile ore, has a trace amount difference depending on the impurities present in the ore. However, all TiCl₄ manufactured using both ores satisfied 99.9% purity or higher. Also, the difference between the residual impurities TiCl₄ and the steam pressure is large, so it is judged that there is a possibility of further improvement in purity if the distillation process is carried out using the difference in the steam pressure of each chloride as shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5.

Calculation results of the vapor pressure of TiCl₄ and residual chloride.

For the quantitative evaluation of the pore formation in the ores, the specific surface area measurement evaluation was conducted, and the results are shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6a, unlike the pore size distribution between 1 and 100 nm for the raw ilmenite ore, pore sizes were distributed in the range between 10 and 600 nm for the synthetic rutile selectively chlorinated for 40 min. This indicates that micropores existed in the raw ilmenite ore and that the distribution range of the pores was later significantly increased by the chlorination. The pore size distribution range of the synthetic rutile was similar to that of the natural rutile after chlorination, but the volume of the open pores was larger for the synthetic rutile. As shown in Fig. 6b, the overall surface areas determined by the BET method of the synthetic rutile and natural rutile were 0.98 and 0.14 m²/g, respectively, compared to the ilmenite ore with 11.8 m²/g. Therefore, when the pore volume and specific surface area distributions were compared, the specific surface area of the synthetic rutile was relatively higher due to the pores with 1–2 nm sizes, indicating that there were more micropores. In the case of the synthetic rutile, the removal of FeO by selective chlorination generated empty spaces in the matrix. It appears that the active input of chlorine into such spaces caused the more active reaction with the remaining TiO₂ than for chlorination of the natural rutile. The synthetic/natural rutile ores started reaction from the surface, and the slowly decreasing particle sizes were similar as shown in Fig. 3. In terms of the reaction efficiency, however, it was found that more particles were generated, and this appears to be because there were more sites capable of chlorination despite the same rutile types.

Figure 6.

Analysis results of (a) incremental volume of ilmenite and synthetic/natural rutiles chlorinated for 30 min (b) BET surface area of synthetic/natural rutiles chlorinated for 30 min.

The TEM micrographs in Fig. 7 show that the porosity generated by the initial selective chlorination was not significantly affected by the production of TiCl₄, and it appears that most of the shapes of the initial pores were maintained. In the case of the natural rutile, the reaction cross section became stronger. As shown in Fig. 7d, the natural rutile with multi-phase multiple grains was subjected to single crystallization as shown in Fig. 7e because the distribution of crystal phases was summarized during the generation of TiCl₄. In Fig. 7e, the diffraction pattern (DP) was measured for each section and it was confirmed that each spot had the same TiO₂ composition. It was also confirmed that the entire area was the grain of the same crystal structure. It is judged that further research is required in the future on the crystal structure and density of natural rutile during chlorination.

Figure 7.

Micrographs of TEM observations for (a) raw ilmenite (b) ilmenite chlorinated for 40 min (c) synthetic rutile chlorinated for 30 min (d) raw natural rutile (e) natural rutile chlorinated for 30 min.

Conclusion

In this study, the chlorination efficiency of synthetic rutile, which was researched by removing FeO_x from ilmenite through selective chlorination using coke as a reducing agent and Cl₂ gas, and natural rutile also was examined for manufacturing of TiCl₄.

1. For selective chlorination of FeO in ilmenite ore, it was found that the purity and yield of the synthetic rutile were determined by the input amounts of coke and chlorine. It was confirmed that TiCl₄ was also generated at the same time when the input amount of one mole of ilmenite reacted with more than one mole of chlorine. Therefore, it is very important to improve the reaction efficiency and purity of TiCl₄ depending on the amount of coke and chlorine gas injected with the titanium ore. In this way, porous synthetic rutile can be obtained depending on the efficiency of the selective chloride process, and can be linked to high purity of TiCl₄ depending on the purity of the synthetic rutile.

2. As shown by SEM analysis, the synthetic rutile remained porous after chlorination, thereby exhibiting higher reaction efficiency than natural rutile. This is due to the fact that selective elimination of FeO does not reduce the particle size of the ilmenite ore in the manufacture of synthetic rutiles using ilmenite ore, and that there is a pore where FeO has been removed, thereby increasing the reaction efficiency of chlorine gas.

3. The BET measurement results showed that the raw ilmenite ore was dominated by micropores as large as several nanometers, but the pore size increased for the synthetic rutile subjected to selective chlorination for 40 min. However, it was confirmed that more micropores were distributed in the synthetic rutile than in natural rutile, and it was also confirmed that such micropores had a larger influence on the chlorination efficiency.

Author contribution

This paper and research results were written through each of the authors' roles. E.J.J. was responsible for overall control and preparation of research contents, while J.K. was responsible for organizing data information. Y.R.L. conducted the whole experiment and discussion together.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.