Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 8;220:108509. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108509

Figure 2. — A) Population average (AUD + control participants) connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions; red=correlated, blue=anticorrelated. B) Coefficients of linear regression accounting for AUD effects on connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions; significant AUD effects surviving FDR correction requiring p=.00357 (p=.05/14 regions) are highlighted in C) presenting only AUD effects passing FDR correction for 14 regions. Population average (AUD + control participants) connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions as a function of D) age and E) sex. Neither age nor sex significantly affected connectivity.

Figure 2. — A) Population average (AUD + control participants) connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions; red=correlated, blue=anticorrelated. B) Coefficients of linear regression accounting for AUD effects on connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions; significant AUD effects surviving FDR correction requiring p=.00357 (p=.05/14 regions) are highlighted in C) presenting only AUD effects passing FDR correction for 14 regions. Population average (AUD + control participants) connectivity between thalamic structures and 14 functional regions as a function of D) age and E) sex. Neither age nor sex significantly affected connectivity.