Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug 18;48(2):160–168. doi: 10.1177/1090198120950617

Table 4.

McNemar Tests of Differences of Six Distinct Frames in Community Garden Statements.

Frame (use rates) Community orientation (49%) Healthy food access (21%) Food donation (17%) Self-empowerment (17%) Symbolic food labels (17%)
Greater good (64%) 2.15*** [1.55, 3.01] 7.48*** [4.99, 11.63] 6.82*** [4.72, 10.15] 10.65*** [6.72, 17.79] 18.64*** [10.20, 37.92]
Community orientation (49%) 4.73*** [3.17, 7.27] 4.58*** [3.18, 6.77] 5.81*** [3.88, 9.10] 9.73*** [5.71, 17.84]
Healthy food access (21%) 1.31 [0.91, 1.89] 1.41+ [0.94, 2.12] 1.56* [0.99, 2.47]
Food donation (17%) 1.02 [0.70, 1.47] 1.04 [0.70, 1.54]
Self-empowerment (17%) 1.02 [0.70, 1.48]

Note. Odds ratios presented; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; two-tailed test. Adapted from Gardening Matters (2018).

+

p < .10.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.