Table 4.
McNemar Tests of Differences of Six Distinct Frames in Community Garden Statements.
| Frame (use rates) | Community orientation (49%) | Healthy food access (21%) | Food donation (17%) | Self-empowerment (17%) | Symbolic food labels (17%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greater good (64%) | 2.15*** [1.55, 3.01] | 7.48*** [4.99, 11.63] | 6.82*** [4.72, 10.15] | 10.65*** [6.72, 17.79] | 18.64*** [10.20, 37.92] |
| Community orientation (49%) | 4.73*** [3.17, 7.27] | 4.58*** [3.18, 6.77] | 5.81*** [3.88, 9.10] | 9.73*** [5.71, 17.84] | |
| Healthy food access (21%) | 1.31 [0.91, 1.89] | 1.41+ [0.94, 2.12] | 1.56* [0.99, 2.47] | ||
| Food donation (17%) | 1.02 [0.70, 1.47] | 1.04 [0.70, 1.54] | |||
| Self-empowerment (17%) | 1.02 [0.70, 1.48] |
Note. Odds ratios presented; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; two-tailed test. Adapted from Gardening Matters (2018).
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.