Table 2.
Results of different Sanders types and treatment modalities.
| Sanders type | Treatment given | No | Post op Bohler’s angle (18°–40°) | MRS score at 1 year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2A | Percutaneous CC screw | 1 | Within range | Good (85) |
| Cast application | 2 | Not within range | Fair (65, 60) | |
| 2B | Essex Lopresti | 3 | Within range | Good 75,85,75 |
| ORIF with CC screw | 1 | Not within range | Fair 55 | |
| Percutaneous CC screw | 2 | Within range | Good (85,75) | |
| Cast application | 2 | Not within range | Fair 45,50 | |
| 2C | Essex Lopresti | 1 | Within range | Good 75,85 |
| Percutaneous CC screw | 1 | Not within range | Fair 65 | |
| Cast application | 4 | Not within range | Fair (Mean 50) | |
| 3AB | Essex Lopresti | 2 | Within range | Good 85,75 |
| Percutaneous CC screw | 1 | Within range | Good 75 | |
| Cast application | 5 | Not within range | Fair (Mean 55) | |
| 3AC | Essex Lopresti | 2 | Within range | Good 70,75 |
| ORIF with CC screw | 2 | Within range | Good 75,75 | |
| Percutaneous CC screw | 1 | Within range | Good 70 | |
| Cast application | 4 | Not within range | 1 showed good result, 3 gave fair results | |
| 3BC | Essex Lopresti | 3 | Within range | Good 70,75,80 |
| Percutaneous CC screw | 1 | Not within range | Fair 45 | |
| ORIF with CC screw | 2 | Within range | Good 75,70 | |
| Cast application | 6 | Not within range | 2 showed good results, 3 gave fair and 1 poor | |
| 4 | Percutaneous CC screw | 2 | Within range | Good 70,70 |
| ORIF with CC screw | 1 | Within range | Good 75 | |
| ORIF with plating | 4 | 2 cases not within range | Good 70,70 Fair 55,60 | |
| Cast application | 8 | Not Within range | 2 had good results,5 fair and 1 poor |