Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;12:1075. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21375-1

Table 1.

The average testing areas under the curve (AUC) of the BRT models at the county level and model-predicted numbers, areas and population sizes of affected counties for the 19 most prevalent tick species in China.

Tick species Average AUC (2.5‒97.5% percentiles) Predicted/observed (relative difference %)
No. of counties Area (10,000 km2) Population size (million)
Ixodes persulcatus 0.892 (0.855–0.929) 380/135 (181.5) 173.2/87.9 (97.0) 149.1/47.5 (213.9)
I. sinensisac 0.924 (0.894–0.953) 630/113 (457.5) 81.2/14.1 (475.9) 363.3/77.2 (370.6)
I. granulatus 0.943 (0.920–0.965) 373/103 (262.1) 62.5/18.6 (236.0) 201.4/51.5 (291.1)
I. crenulatusb 0.918 (0.885–0.951) 205/76 (169.7) 322.3/113.0 (185.2) 33.8/16.4 (106.1)
I. ovatus 0.828 (0.778–0.878) 335/57 (487.7) 145.1/28.2 (414.5) 110.5/20.9 (428.7)
Haemaphysalis longicornisac 0.900 (0.879–0.920) 1140/303 (276.2) 172.8/70.9 (143.7) 588.0/138.3 (325.2)
Ha. concinna 0.875 (0.827–0.922) 165/72 (129.2) 86.2/55.3 (55.9) 51.1/24.9 (105.2)
Ha. japonica 0.888 (0.835–0.941) 95/52 (82.7) 36.4/21.4 (70.1) 27.7/17.8 (55.6)
Ha. hystricis 0.893 (0.854–0.933) 205/43 (376.7) 43.2/12.5 (245.6) 86.2/19.6 (339.8)
Rhipicephalus sanguineusc 0.833 (0.800–0.866) 470/221 (112.7) 163.1/94.0 (73.5) 236.4/96.9 (144.0)
R. microplusac 0.871 (0.844–0.898) 678/188 (260.6) 138.3/54.1 (155.6) 349.6/106.8 (227.3)
R. haemaphysaloidesc 0.901 (0.862–0.940) 471/76 (519.7) 76.3/14.4 (429.9) 232.9/35.5 (556.1)
Dermacentor nuttalliab 0.966 (0.956–0.975) 557/382 (45.8) 378.6/274.1 (38.1) 153.2/109.3 (40.2)
D. silvaruma 0.926 (0.907–0.944) 492/274 (79.6) 155.6/129.7 (20.0) 168.1/96.2 (74.7)
D. daghestanicusb 0.930 (0.882–0.977) 112/62 (80.6) 196.5/95.9 (104.9) 22.0/13.6 (61.8)
D. marginatus 0.960 (0.942–0.978) 81/62 (30.6) 54.3/47.7 (13.8) 19.0/13.9 (36.7)
Hyalomma scupense 0.912 (0.893–0.932) 410/234 (75.2) 168.6/137.3 (22.8) 160.7/81.9 (96.2)
Hy. asiaticumb 0.948 (0.926–0.969) 186/135 (37.8) 299.7/212.2 (41.2) 39.2/31.4 (24.8)
Argas persicusb 0.874 (0.836–0.902) 225/68 (230.9) 208.7/45.7 (356.7) 104.2/42.3 (146.3)

The predicted numbers are compared with the actual observations from field surveys and the relative differences (%) are given in parentheses.

aTop 5 tick species affecting largest numbers of counties.

bTop 5 tick species affecting largest areas.

cTop 5 tick species affecting largest population sizes.