Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;24:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100364

Table 2.

Risk of bias across the included studies.

Study Selection bias
Random sequence generation
Selection bias
Allocation concealment
Reporting bias
Selective reporting
Detection bias
Blinding (outcome assessment)
Attrition bias
Incomplete outcome data
Other bias
Inclusion of a comparator
1. ⁎Allen et al. (2016) Low Low Low High Low Low
2. ⁎Bergström et al. (2010) Low Low Unclear Low Low High
3. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2001) Unclear Low Unclear Low Low Low
4. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2005) Low Unclear Unclear Low Low High
5. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2006) Low Unclear Unclear Low Low Low
6. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2003) Low Unclear Low High Low High
7. ⁎Ciuca et al. (2018) Low Low Low Low Low Low
8. ⁎Fogliati et al. (2016) Low Low Low High Low Low
9. ⁎Kiropoulos et al. (2008) Low Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Low
10. ⁎Klein et al. (2009) Low Low Unclear Low Low High
11. ⁎Klein et al. (2006) Unclear Low Unclear Unclear Low Low
12. ⁎Richards et al. (2006) Unclear Unclear Unclear Low Low Low
13. ⁎Wims et al. (2010) Low Low High High Low Low

Note: low = low risk of bias; high = high risk of bias; unclear = unclear risk of bias; N = no; Y = yes.