Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 7;24:100364. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100364

Table 3.

Clinical significance at post-test and follow-up in both treatment and control groups.

Study Classification of responders iCBT treated (n) iCBT treated positive (post-test) iCBT treated positive (follow-up) Controls treated (n) Controls treated positive (post-test) Controls treated positive (follow-up)
1. ⁎Allen et al. (2016) CC, RCI 27 75% 82% 37 29%
2. ⁎Bergström et al. (2010) CSR, RFB 50 57% 70% 54 62% 62%
3. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2001) RCI 21 81% 20 33%
4. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2005) CSR, RCI 24 62% 92% 25 69% 88%
5. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2006) CSR, RCI 30 71% 64% 30 4%
6. ⁎Carlbring et al. (2003) CC, CSR 11 55% 11 37%
7. ⁎Ciuca et al. (2018) CC, CSR 36 63% 37 31%
8. ⁎Fogliati et al. (2016) RFB 68 37% 54% 64 44% 53%
9. ⁎Kiropoulos et al. (2008) CC, CSR 46 33% 40 33%
10. ⁎Klein et al. (2009) CC, CSR 28 34% 29 30%
11. ⁎Klein et al. (2006) CC, CSR 19 58% 84% 18 44% 73%
12. ⁎Richards et al. (2006) CC, CSR 12 47% 66% 11 64% 51%
13. ⁎Wims et al. (2010) CC 29 70% 25

Note: CC = clinical cutoff; CSR = clinician severity rating; RCI = Reliable Change Index; RFB = reduction from baseline.