Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;157(4):1–8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5809

Table 2. Performance of Morphea Subtype Classification Schemes in Categorizing Patients.

Morphea subtype Patients, No. (%) (N = 944)
Mayo Clinic (Peterson et al6) criteria (533 of 944 patients [56%] categorized)
Morphea
Plaque 141 (15)
Generalized 244 (26)
Bullous 0
Linear 474 (50)
Deep 0
Unsuccessfully classified 411 (44)
Patients with deep lesionsa 367/703 (52)
Eosinophilic fasciitis 3 (0.3)
Indeterminate subtype 41 (4)
Padua criteria7 (900 of 944 patients [95%] categorized)
Circumscribed morphea 141 (15)
Linear scleroderma 474 (50)
Generalized morphea 244 (26)
Pansclerotic morphea 3 (0.3)
Mixed morphea 38 (4)
Unsuccessfully classified 44 (5)
Eosinophilic fasciitis 3 (0.3)
Indeterminate subtype 41 (4)
European Dermatology Forum criteria8 (487 of 944 patients [52%] categorized)
Limited
Morphea
Plaque 141 (15)
Guttate 0
Superficial 0
Generalized 244 (26)
Linear 474 (50)
Deep 0
Mixed 38 (4)
Eosinophilic fasciitis 3 (0.3)
Unsuccessfully classified 457 (48)
Patients with deep lesionsa 367/703 (52)
Patients with superficial lesionsa 116/703 (17)
Indeterminate subtype 41 (5)
a

Owing to discrepancies in data collection between the 2 databases, information available for 703 of 944 patients.