. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 18.

Published in final edited form as: Child Abuse Negl. 2012 Mar 16;36(3):226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.10.012

Table 3.

Hierarchical regression analyses for cross-sectional child coping competence.

Variable	Social CC			Achievement CC			Affective CC
Variable	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Center	−.035	.018	−.074	−.002	.017	−.004	−.069	.020	−.143^**
Sex	−.040	.018	−.085^*	−.050	.017	−.116^**	−.048	.019	−.100^*
Ethnicity	−.013	.021	−.028	−.073	.020	−.171^**	−.016	.023	−.032
Income	.005	.022	.010	−.022	.021	−.053	.030	.024	.062
Attendance	−.006	.019	−.012	.016	.018	.037	−.005	.021	−.011
Behavior problems-ADHD	−.105	.023	−.222^**	−.147	.022	−.344^**	−.134	.025	−.278^**
Behavior problems-ODD	−.148	.023	−.310^**	−.003	.022	−.008	−.034	.025	−.069
Child abuse potential	−.029	.021	−.061	−.045	.019	−.104^*	−.048	.022	−.098^*
Sex × CAPI	−.010	.018	−.021	−.016	.017	−.037	.024	.020	.048
Ethnicity × CAPI	−.004	.019	−.008	.008	.018	.017	.009	.020	.017

Note: CAPI, pre-intervention Child Abuse Potential Inventory; CC, coping competence.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.