Table 4.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Longitudinal Prediction of Child Coping Competence.

Variable	Social CC			Achievement CC			Affective CC
	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Center	.011	.017	.027	−.010	.015	−.025	−.005	.016	−.012
Sex	.000	.017	.000	−.015	.015	−.038	.003	.016	−.006
Ethnicity	−.030	.019	−.070	−.008	.018	−.021	−.035	.019	−.085
Income	.034	.020	.076	.013	.018	.034	.054	.020	.128**
Attendance	−.004	.018	−.010	.012	.016	.028	.014	.018	.032
T1 coping competence	.173	.018	.401	.195	.016	.511**	.182	.017	.436**
Beh Prob – T2 ECBI-2	−.163	.018	−.384**	−.091	.016	−.237**	−.133	.017	−.332**
Child abuse potential	.007	.019	.017	−.010	.017	−.025	−.013	.019	−.032
Sex × CAPI	.011	.018	.026	.000	.016	.001	−.012	.017	−.030
Ethnicity × CAPI	.012	.017	.027	.019	.016	.047	−.004	.017	−.010

Note: ECBII, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory-2; CAPI, pre-intervention Child Abuse Potential Inventory; and CC, follow up Coping Competence.

^**p < .01.