Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):2201–2211.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.033

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Molecular mechanisms of escape and comparison of N501Y RBD/269 Fab and RBD/scFv269 complexes

(A) CDR-L1 (thin sticks) positions of a panel of V3-53 Fabs relative to N501 on the RBD (surface, with N501 highlighted in green).

(B) The side chain of N501 makes extensive contacts with residues from CDR-L1 in the RBD-158 Fab complex (left, PDB: 7BEJ). In the right panel, N501 does not make any contact with p2c-2f11 Fab (PDB: 7CDI) whose LC is most similar in sequence and has the same CDR-L1, L2, and L3 lengths to mAb 222 shown by a blast of the LC of 222 against the PDB. The orientation and position of Y501 in the N501Y RBD/269 Fab complex is shown by overlapping the RBDs in both panels.

(C) Crystallographic structures of RBD/Fab 269, N501Y RBD/Fab 269, and RBD/scFv269. Overlay of Cαs of N501Y RBD/Fab 269 (blue) with RBD/Fab 269 (cyan) and RBD/scFv269 (salmon) by superimposing the RBDs of the three complexes (PDB: 7NEG, 7NEH, 7BEM, respectively).

(D) Structure changes in the 496–501 loop of the RBD and the CDR-L1 loop that contacts the mutation site.

(E) Structural differences of the CDR-L3 loops between the three complexes.

See also Tables S1 and S3.