Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 18;21:54. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02122-4

Table 1.

Relative abundances and results of statistical evaluation of the top 20 genera obtained using tape stripping with three different types of adhesive (acrylic, urethane, and silicone) to evaluate skin microbiota

Relative abundance (%) Friedman test
P value
P value of Nemenyi post-hoc testa
Genus Acrylic Urethane Silicone A–U A–S U–S
Cutibacterium 58.2 (40.9–77.0) 66.7 (45.7–75.6) 51.9 (26.8–58.4) 0.12
Staphylococcus 5.4 (1.2–12.7) 7.5 (1.8–8.2) 11.3 (3.7–15.0) 0.0498* 1.0 0.086 0.086
Pseudomonas 4.5 (3.5–4.9) 6.2 (4.8–7.3) 7.2 (6.4–10.0) 0.013* 0.086 0.013* 0.76
Corynebacterium 1.6 (0.2–4.2) 1.8 (1.4–3.7) 3.2 (1.5–5.4) 0.070
Enhydrobacter 1.3 (0.0–2.1) 0.4 (0.3–1.2) 1.0 (0.6–2.7) 0.44
Paracoccus 0.8 (0.1–1.8) 0.4 (0.0–1.1) 0.8 (0.2–1.2) 0.14
Streptococcus 0.0 (0.0–0.4) 0.3 (0.0–0.6) 0.8 (0.3–1.5) 0.069
Lawsonella 0.7 (0.4–2.4) 0.5 (0.3–1.2) 0.6 (0.3–0.8) 0.29
Curvibacter 0.5 (0.1–0.7) 0.4 (0.2–1.4) 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.89
Sphingomonas 0.6 (0.2–1.0) 0.3 (0.3–1.7) 0.5 (0.0–0.9) 0.92
Gardnerella 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.3) 0.76
Yersiniaceae 0.4 (0.4–0.5) 0.6 (0.3–0.9) 0.6 (0.3–0.8) 0.46
Brevundimonas 0.2 (0.0–0.6) 0.0 (0.0–0.3) 0.2 (0.0–0.3) 0.38
Methylobacterium–Methylorubrum 0.5 (0.3–1.0) 0.1 (0.0–0.8) 0.3 (0.0–0.4) 0.24
Bacteroides 0.0 (0.0–0.2) 0.0 (0.0–0.5) 0.1 (0.0–0.9) 0.23
Prevotella 0.0 (0.0–0.2) 0.1 (0.0–0.7) 0.1 (0.0–0.8) 0.65
Comamonas 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.37
Escherichia–Shigella 0.0 (0.0–0.2) 0.2 (0.0–0.4) 0.3 (0.0–1.3) 0.38
Massilia 0.1 (0.0–0.3) 0.0 (0.0–0.4) 0.3 (0.0–0.3) 0.89
Finegoldia 0.1 (0.0–0.5) 0.0 (0.0–1.1) 0.0 (0.0–0.3) 0.83

Data are expressed as the median (interquartile range)

A Acrylic adhesive, U Urethane adhesive, S Silicone adhesive

*P < 0.05

aAdjusted P value by the Holm method; only evaluated when the Friedman test was significant