Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;4(6):1–9. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa359

Table 2.

Comparison of EVAHEART, HeartMate II, and HeartMate 3 Devices

EVAHEART HeartMate II HeartMate 3
Rotor design Centrifugal Axial Centrifugal
Bearing design Hydrodynamic levitation Mechanical/pivot Magnetic levitation
Pump position Extratrathoracic (pump pocket) Extratrathoracic (pump pocket) Intrapericardial
Artificial pulse None None Yes
Pump speed 800–3000 rpm 3000–9000 rpm 6000–15 000 rpm
Pump size 76 mm × 58 mm 81 mm × 43 mm 50.3 mm × 33.8 mm
Pump weight 420 g 281.3 g 200 g
Positive point
  • Cool seal system

  • Flexible inflow cannula

  • Flexible inflow cannula

  • Used worldwide

  • Small sized pump

  • Less pump thrombosis formation

  • Used worldwide

Negative point
  • Pump failure

  • CVA event

  • Thick driveline

  • Use only Japan, China, and USA

  • Pump thrombosis/failure

  • CVA event